podcast  PDF

PRACTICE POINT

Uncomplicated pneumonia in healthy Canadian children and youth: Practice points for management

Posted: Dec 4 2015

The Canadian Paediatric Society gives permission to print single copies of this document from our website. For permission to reprint or reproduce multiple copies, please see our copyright policy.

Principal author(s)

Nicole Le Saux, Joan L Robinson; Canadian Paediatric Society, Infectious Diseases and Immunization Committee
Paediatr Child Health 2015;20(8):441-45.

Abstract

Although immunization has decreased the incidence of bacterial pneumonia in vaccinated children, pneumonia remains common in healthy children. Symptoms of bacterial pneumonia frequently overlap those present with viral infections or reactive airway disease. Optimally, the diagnosis of bacterial pneumonia should be supported by a chest radiograph before starting antimicrobials. Factors such as age, vital signs and other measures of illness severity are critical when deciding whether to admit a patient to hospital. Because Streptococcus pneumoniae continues to be the most common cause of bacterial pneumonia in children, prescribing amoxicillin or ampicillin for seven to 10 days remains the mainstay of empirical therapy for nonsevere pneumonia .If improvement does not occur, consideration should be given to searching for complications (empyema or lung abscess). Routine chest radiographs at the end of therapy are not recommended unless clinically indicated.

Key Words: Antimicrobial therapy; Bacterial pneumonia; Viral pneumonia

Most physicians who care for children and youth have had experience with managing acute pneumonia. The incidence of pneumonia due to any etiology is lower in the developed areas of the world compared with less developed areas because immunization coverage rates may be lower in developing areas.[1] Pneumococcal conjugate vaccines have been shown to decrease radiologically proven pneumonia admission rates in children younger than five years of age by an average of 27%.[2][3]

The present practice point focuses on the current diagnosis and management of uncomplicated, acute, community-acquired pneumonia in healthy immunized children with no underlying pulmonary pathology aside from mild reactive airways disease. The present practice point does not apply to persistent (chronic) pneumonia syndromes (with symptoms for >2 weeks), aspiration pneumonia or recurrent pneumonias, or to pneumonia associated with chronic medical problems such as immunodeficiency, because these pneumonias may be caused by different pathogens or require more extensive investigation. The present practice point replaces a previous document published in 2011.[4]

Definition and host risk factors

Pneumonia is an acute inflammation of the parenchyma of the lower respiratory tract caused by a microbial pathogen. Bacterial infections are usually primary but, occasionally, viral respiratory tract infections such as influenza are followed by bacterial pneumonias.[5] Uncomplicated pneumonias may be accompanied by small parapneumonic effusions. Evidence of empyema (pus in the pleural space), a lung abscess or a necrotic portion of lung parenchyma implies the development of a complicated pneumonia.

Etiology

The most common causes of pneumonia in infants and preschool children are viruses that usually, but not exclusively, circulate in winter (eg, respiratory syncytial virus, influenza, parainfluenza virus and human metapneumovirus). Viruses as a sole cause of pneumonia are less common in older children, with the exception of influenza.

Among bacteria, Streptococcus pneumoniae continues to be the most common bacterial pathogen causing pneumonia in children of all ages. Group A streptococcal pneumonia is much less common. Although Staphylococcus aureus is not a common cause of paediatric pneumonia, it has been increasingly encountered in communities where methicillin-resistant S aureus (MRSA) is prevalent. Haemophilus influenzae type b has almost disappeared because of vaccination. Mycoplasma pneumoniae and Chlamydophila pneumoniae are more common causes of pneumonia among school-age children, but they occasionally cause pneumonia in younger children.[6]

Symptoms and signs of acute pneumonia

The symptoms of pneumonia may be nonspecific, especially in infants and younger children. Acute onset of fever, cough, difficulty breathing, poor feeding or vomiting, and lack of interest in normal activities are common symptoms. Chest or abdominal pain may also be prominent features. Abrupt onset of rigors favours a bacterial cause. M pneumoniae is typically characterized by malaise and headache for seven to 10 days before the onset of fever and cough, which then predominate. During annual influenza season, influenza (with or without a secondary bacterial infection) as a cause of pneumonia should be strongly considered. Influenza infections may be heralded by the sudden onset of systemic symptoms such as diffuse myalgias and fever, which are then followed by cough, sore throat or other respiratory symptoms.

Children typically experience fever and tachypnea (determined by counting the respiratory rate for 60 s in a calm state) (Table 1). Indrawing, retractions and/or a tracheal tug indicate respiratory distress (dyspnea). Measurement of oxygen saturation with pulse oximetry is indicated in all patients presenting to a hospital or with significant illness because hypoxemia may not be clinically apparent and cyanosis is only associated with severe hypoxemia. However, a normal oxygen saturation does not exclude the possibility of pneumonia.

Physical signs suggesting pneumonic consolidation include dullness to percussion, increased tactile fremitus, reduced normal vesicular breath sounds and increased bronchial breath sounds – all of which may be difficult to detect in young children. The predominance of wheezing and hypoxia should suggest the possibility of bronchiolitis or mucous plugging from asthma, rather than pneumonia. Signs of an effusion include dullness to percussion, decreased tactile fremitus, and decreased or absent breath sounds. There may be associated signs of dehydration and/or sepsis.

TABLE 1
Age-specific criteria for tachypnea
Age Approximate normal
respiratory rates
Upper limit that should be used to define tachypnea
<2 months 34–50 60
2–12 months 25–40 50
1–5 years 20–30 40
>5 years 15–25 30
Data presented as breaths/min

Investigations

Imaging

Radiographs are not indicated for children experiencing wheezing with a typical presentation of bronchiolitis or asthma because bacterial pneumonia is very unlikely. When bacterial pneumonia is suspected clinically (a febrile child with acute respiratory symptoms and physical findings compatible with consolidation or pleural effusion), a chest radiograph (both postero-anterior and lateral) should usually be obtained.

The reason for imaging is that the clinical features of other conditions overlap with bacterial pneumonia, and antibiotics may be avoided if the chest radiograph does not suggest bacterial pneumonia.[7] However, in cases where the diagnosis of bacterial pneumonia is highly suspected from history, combined with typical clinical and physical findings and the child is not sufficiently ill to require hospitalization, a chest radiograph is not essential. All hospitalized children should have a chest radiograph performed to assess the extent of pneumonia and determine the presence of pleural effusion or abscess.

The prominent radiographic pattern in bacterial pneumonia is alveolar/airspace disease that is seen as consolidations. Classically, these present as lobar consolidations with air bronchograms; however, airspace disease may also take the form of subsegmental or nodular opacities (eg, round pneumonia) or infiltrates. Clinical correlation is always important, especially when considering other, rarer causes of similar radiographic patterns.

Poorly defined patches of infiltrates or atelectasis are more indicative of a viral etiology.[8] The ‘atypical’ pathogens, M pneumoniae or C pneumoniae, classically produce bilateral focal or interstitial infiltrates that appear to be more extensive relative to the milder but persistent symptoms.

Ultrasound at the point of care appears to be sensitive and specific for detecting pneumonic infiltrates but requires further validation.[9] Ultrasound and computed tomography are also useful in the diagnosis of complicated pneumonia. Both will detect parapneumonic effusions, which often accompany uncomplicated pneumonia, as well as empyemas, where persistent fever is a predominant symptom. Culture and drainage of a pleural effusion is indicated if the effusion is large and/or is clinically important as a cause for respiratory compromise or when response to medical therapy alone is not satisfactory.[10]

Detecting the pathogen

Determining the etiology of bacterial pneumonia is difficult in children. Most cases are not bacteremic at the time of diagnosis. If sputum is available (usually only in children >10 years of age), it should be sent for Gram staining and, if considered adequate, cultured.

Viral testing of nasopharyngeal secretions is usually not indicated for outpatients with suspected pneumonia. However, such testing should be strongly considered in children admitted during influenza season with possible viral pneumonia because antivirals are likely to be of benefit for influenza pneumonia, particularly in moderately to severely ill children.[11][12] Children (usually school age) with subacute, nonsevere pneumonia, presenting with features such as prominent cough, minimal leukocytosis and a nonlobar infiltrate, may have pneumonia caused by M pneumoniae or C pneumoniae. Nasopharyngeal specimens should be sent for molecular diagnostics if testing is available and the child is hospitalized, bearing in mind that the length of carriage is unknown; a positive result may indicate remote infection.

Bloodwork

Typical bacterial pneumonias usually present with higher peripheral white blood cell counts than ‘atypical’ bacterial or viral pneumonias (eg, M pneumoniae). A complete blood count with differential testing and blood cultures (before starting antimicrobial therapy, if possible) are indicated for children who are hospitalized. Even though the yield from blood cultures is low, a positive result is helpful, especially if the child subsequently experiences a complicated course. Furthermore, it is an important part of surveillance for invasive pneumococcal disease, especially in the post-13-valent conjugated pneumococcal vaccine era. As adequate volumes of blood are more likely to yield a pathogen, the minimum volume of blood cultured should be at least 1 mL to 2 mL in infants, 4 mL to 5 mL in children <10 years of age and 10 mL to 20 mL in older children.

Guidelines for referral to hospital or hospital admission

Most children with pneumonia can be managed as outpatients. Specific paediatric criteria for admission are not available. Hospitalization is generally indicated if a child has inadequate oral intake, is intolerant of oral therapy, has severe illness or respiratory compromise (eg, grunting, nasal flaring, apnea, hypoxemia), or if the pneumonia is complicated. There should be a lower threshold for admitting infants younger than six months of age to hospital because they may need more supportive care and monitoring, and it can be difficult to recognize subtle deterioration clinically.

Management

If influenza is detected or suspected, strong consideration should be given to prompt treatment with neuraminidase inhibitors (oseltamivir, zanamivir). Treatment with antivirals has been shown to provide benefit and may prevent secondary bacterial infections, particularly in hospitalized or moderately to severely ill children.[12]-[14] When other viruses are detected in a nasopharyngeal sample and/or the chest radiograph is most compatible with viral pneumonia (ie, without consolidations), manage with supportive care (ie, oxygen and rehydration if required) without antibiotics, unless there is convincing evidence of a secondary bacterial pneumonia.

The primary goal of antimicrobial therapy, for the vast majority of uncomplicated community-acquired pneumonias, is to provide good coverage for S pneumoniae, because molecular-based techniques have shown this to be the predominant bacterial pathogen.[15]-[17] Therefore, outpatients with lobar or broncho-pneumonia should usually be treated with oral amoxicillin. Patients who require hospitalization but do not have a life-threatening illness should usually be started empirically on intravenous ampicillin. There is recent data demonstrating that ampicillin alone leads to a good clinical outcome in almost all cases of community-acquired pneumonia, including cases that require hospitalization.[18]-[20]

Children who experience respiratory failure or septic shock associated with pneumonia should receive empiric therapy with a third-generation cephalosporin because it offers broader coverage. Ceftriaxone or cefotaxime offer better coverage than amoxicillin or ampicillin for beta-lactamase-producing H influenzae and may be more efficacious against high-level penicillin-resistant pneumococcus – and possibly provide empirical coverage for the rare methicillin-susceptible S aureus (a rare cause of pneumonia).[21] However, when there is rapidly progressing multilobar disease or pneumatoceles, the addition of vancomycin is suggested empirically to provide extra coverage for MRSA until culture results are available. If results of microbiological investigations in these patients do not reveal a pathogen, transitioning to ampicillin with subsequent oral amoxicillin is reasonable.

The antimicrobial management of patients with suspected empyema is similar to that of patients without empyema because there is a predominance of S pneumoniae being the etiological agent, with some cases being due to Group A steptococcal or S aureus.[10][22] If the empyema is due to S aureus, pleural fluid cultures are usually positive if they were obtained within a day or two after start of antimicrobials. If vancomycin was started empirically in such cases, it can usually be discontinued when cultures are negative if there is no other evidence of MRSA colonization or infection. If S pneumoniae is detected in blood or respiratory secretions and is penicillin-susceptible, treatment with either intravenous ampicillin or penicillin is recommended, followed by oral therapy with amoxicillin. If another pathogen is detected in pleural fluid or blood, modifications to the antimicrobial regimen should be made based on antimicrobial susceptibility.

The role of antimicrobials in treating both M pneumoniae and C pneumoniae is unknown because most children resolve infection without macrolides. However, treatment may be appropriate to hasten recovery in children who are more seriously ill or have persistent cough. The usual treatment is azithromycin for five days. However, macrolide resistance is now very common in M pneumoniae in Asia and sometimes occurs in Canada.[23][24] In children ≥8 years of age (minimum), doxycycline is likely to be effective against such strains.

If patients with suspected bacterial pneumonia do not respond to therapy within 48 h to 72 h, a chest radiograph should be obtained and a further clinical evaluation carried out. This reassessment should indicate whether an empyema or other complication has developed in the interim. Further history or imaging may also suggest a less common cause (eg, tuberculosis) or a noninfectious etiology (eg, a collagen vascular disease).

In Canada, it is still standard to treat uncomplicated presumed bacterial pneumonia in children who have been hospitalized for a total of seven to 10 days. In one recent study, five days appeared to be adequate for outpatient pneumonia.[20] Pneumonia complicated by empyema or abscess formation requires a longer duration of therapy, as determined by the clinical course (usually two to four weeks). Oral step-down therapy is usually appropriate once patients are improved, afebrile and otherwise ready for hospital discharge.

Suggested doses for the more commonly used antibiotics are listed in Table 2. In all situations, if a bacterial pathogen known to cause pneumonia is detected in blood or pleural fluid, it is almost certainly the sole pathogen and antimicrobial therapy should be modified to the narrowest spectrum agent based on susceptibility results of the pathogen isolated.

TABLE 2
Doses of common antimicrobials recommended for suspected or proven bacterial pneumonia
Antibiotic Route Regimen
Amoxicillin, maximum 4000 mg/day PO 40–90 mg/kg/day divided 3 times daily*
Ampicillin, maximum 12 g/day IV 200 mg/kg/day divided every 6 h
Ceftriaxone, maximum 4 g/day IV 50–100 mg/kg/day divided every 12 h or 24 h
Penicillin G (if confirmed to be due to Streptococcus pneumoniae that is
penicillin-susceptible)
IV 200,000–250,000 U/day divided every 4 h to 6 h;
maximum 24 million U/day
Azithromycin (for suspected or proven Mycoplasma or Chlamydophila
pneumoniae
)
IV/PO Given as a single daily dose; 10 mg/kg on day 1; 5 mg/kg on days 2 to 5;
maximum 500 mg/day
*Although twice-daily dosing is adequate for otitis media, three times-daily dosing is recommended for pneumonia. IV Intravenously; PO Orally

Previous adverse events with penicillin or other antibiotic therapy

If a patient experienced a nonurticarial rash after previous use of a penicillin or amoxicillin, they can safely be started on ampicillin or amoxicillin therapy.

It is now recognized that the cross-reactivity rate between penicillins and second- or third-generation cephalosporins (apart from cefoxitin) is extremely low. Therefore, cefuroxime, cefprozil or ceftriaxone can be prescribed for penicillin-allergic patients. However, if the reaction to a penicillin included rapid onset of urticaria, angioedema, hypotension or bronchospasm following the dose of penicillin, the patient should be observed for 30 min following the first dose of cephalosporin in a setting where epinephrine is available.[25] Clarithromycin or azithromycin may also be used, but pneumococcal resistance to these antimicrobials is increasingly common and careful follow-up must be ensured. Although rare, a history of a serious nonimmunoglobulin E-mediated reactions (eg, Stevens-Johnson syndrome or toxic epidermal necrolysis) attributed to an antibiotic is also a contraindication to using related antibiotics. In such cases, a different class of drug should be selected.

Expected clinical course and follow-up for uncomplicated pneumonia

Clinical improvement (improved appetite, decreasing fever, resolution of tachypnea and decreasing oxygen requirements) should be evident within 48 h of starting antibiotic therapy with bacterial pneumonia. However, improvement may be slower with viral pneumonia. If the patient does not show clinical improvement or worsens within the expected time frame, a chest radiograph or ultrasound should be repeated to look for evidence of a complication (eg, empyema or abscess). Other reasons for lack of clinical resolution may include a foreign body aspiration, reactive airways disease with atelectasis, a congenital pulmonary anomaly, tuberculosis or unrecognized immunodeficiency with an opportunistic infection.

Radiographic resolution in most uncomplicated pneumonia cases may take up to four to six weeks. Repeat radiographs when children are otherwise well are not indicated to document improvement.[26]

Acknowledgements

This practice point has been reviewed by the Acute Care and Community Paediatrics Committees of the Canadian Paediatric Society, as well as by the CPS Hospital Paediatrics Section and representatives of AMMI Canada.

CPS INFECTIOUS DISEASES AND IMMUNIZATION COMMITTEE
Members: Natalie A Bridger MD; Shalini Desai MD; Ruth Grimes MD (Board Representative); Charles PS Hui MD (past member);
Timothy Mailman MD; Joan L Robinson MD (Chair); Marina Salvadori MD (past member); Otto G Vanderkooi MD
Liaisons: Upton D Allen MBBS, Canadian Pediatric AIDS Research Group; Tobey Audcent MD, Committee to Advise on Tropical Medicine and Travel (CATMAT), Public Health Agency of Canada; Carrie Byington MD, Committee on Infectious Diseases, American Academy of Pediatrics; Rhonda Kropp BScN NMPH, Public Health Agency of Canada; Nicole Le Saux MD, Immunization Monitoring Program, ACTive (IMPACT); Dorothy L Moore MD, National Advisory Committee on Immunization (NACI); Patricia Mousmanis MD, College of Family Physicians of Canada
Consultant: Noni E MacDonald MD

Principle authors: Nicole Le Saux MD, Joan L Robinson MD

References

  1. Rudan I, Boschi-Pinto C, Biloglav Z, Mulholland K, Campbell H. Epidemiology and etiology of childhood pneumonia. Bull World Heal Organ 2008;86(5):408-16.
  2. Lucero MG, Dulalia VE, Nillos LT, et al. Pneumococcal conjugate vaccines for preventing vaccine-type invasive pneumococcal disease and X-ray defined pneumonia in children less than two years of age. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2009(4):CD004977.
  3. Hansen J, Black S, Shinefield H, et al. Effectiveness of heptavalent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine in children younger than 5 years of age for prevention of pneumonia: Updated analysis using World Health Organization standardized interpretation of chest radiographs. Pediatr Infect Dis J 2006;25(9):779-81.
  4. Le Saux N, Robinson JL; CPS Infectious Diseases and Immunization Committee. Pneumonia in healthy Canadian children and youth: Practice points for management. Paediatr Child Health 2011;16(7):417-20.
  5. Klugman KP, Chien YW, Madhi SA. Pneumococcal pneumonia and influenza: A deadly combination. Vaccine 2009;27(Suppl 3):C9-C14.
  6. Michelow IC, Olsen K, Lozano J, et al. Epidemiology and clinical characteristics of community-acquired pneumonia in hospitalized children. Pediatrics 2004;113(4):701-7.
  7. Zimmerman DR, Kovalski N, Fields S, Lumelsky D, Miron D. Diagnosis of childhood pneumonia: Clinical assessment without radiological confirmation may lead to overtreatment. Pediatr Emerg Care 2012;28(7):646-9.
  8. Tew J, Calenoff L, Berlin BS. Bacterial or nonbacterial pneumonia: Accuracy of radiographic diagnosis. Radiology 1977;124(3):607-12.
  9. Pereda MA, Chavez MA, Hooper-Miele CC, et al. Lung ultrasound for the diagnosis of pneumonia in children: A meta-analysis. Pediatrics 2015;135(4):714-22.
  10. Chibuk T, Cohen E, Robinson J, Mahant S, Hartfield D; Canadian Paediatric Society, Hospital Paediatrics Section. Paediatric complicated pneumonia: Diagnosis and management of empyema. Paediatr Child Health 2011;16(7):425-9.
  11. Hamano-Hasegawa K, Morozumi M, Nakayama E, et al. Comprehensive detection of causative pathogens using real-time PCR to diagnose pediatric community-acquired pneumonia. J Infect Chemother 2008;14(6):424-32.
  12. Louie JK, Yang S, Samuel MC, Uyeki TM, Schechter R. Neuraminidase inhibitors for critically ill children with influenza. Pediatrics 2013;132(6):e1539-45.
  13. Wang K, Shun-Shin M, Gill P, Perera R, Harnden A. Neuraminidase inhibitors for preventing and treating influenza in children (published trials only). Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2012;4:CD002744.
  14. Allen UD; Canadian Paediatric Society, Infectious Diseases and Immunization Committee. The use of antiviral drugs for influenza: Guidance for practitioners, 2012/2013; Paediatric summary. Paediatr Child Health 2013;18(3):155-62.
  15. Pernica JM, Moldovan I, Chan F, Slinger R. Real-time polymerase chain reaction for microbiological diagnosis of parapneumonic effusions in Canadian children. Can J Infect Dis Med Microbiol 2014;25(3):151-4.
  16. Blaschke AJ, Heyrend C, Byington CL, et al. Molecular analysis improves pathogen identification and epidemiologic study of pediatric parapneumonic empyema. Pediatr Infect Dis J 2011;30(4):289-94.
  17. Lin TY, Hwang KP, Liu CC, et al. Etiology of empyema thoracis and parapneumonic pleural effusion in Taiwanese children and adolescents younger than 18 years of age. Pediatr Infect Dis J 2013;32(4):419-21.
  18. Newman RE, Hedican EB, Herigon JC, Williams DD, Williams AR, Newland JG. Impact of a guideline on management of children hospitalized with community-acquired pneumonia. Pediatrics 2012;129(3):e597-604.
  19. Queen MA, Myers AL, Hall M, et al. Comparative effectiveness of empiric antibiotics for community-acquired pneumonia. Pediatrics 2014;133(1):e23-9.
  20. Greenberg D, Givon-Lavi N, Sadaka Y, Ben-Shimol S, Bar-Ziv J, Dagan R. Short-course antibiotic treatment for community-acquired alveolar pneumonia in ambulatory children: A double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial. Pediatr Infect Dis J 2014;33(2):136-42.
  21. Moran GJ, Krishnadasan A, Gorwitz RJ, et al. Prevalence of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus as an etiology of community-acquired pneumonia. Clin Infect Dis 2012;54(8):1126-33.
  22. Bradley JS, Byington CL, Shah SS, et al. The management of community-acquired pneumonia in infants and children older than 3 months of age: Clinical practice guidelines by the Pediatric Infectious Diseases Society and the Infectious Diseases Society of America. Clin Infect Dis 2011;53(7):e25-76.
  23. Eshaghi A, Memari N, Tang P, et al. Macrolide-resistant Mycoplasma pneumoniae in humans, Ontario, Canada, 2010-2011. Emerg Infect Dis 2013;19(9).
  24. Zhou Y, Zhang Y, Sheng Y, Zhang L, Shen Z, Chen Z. More complications occur in macrolide-resistant than in macrolide-sensitive Mycoplasma pneumoniae pneumonia. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2014;58(2):1034-8.
  25. Lagacé-Wiens P, Rubinstein E. Adverse reactions to ß-lactam antimicrobials. Expert Opin Drug Saf 2012;11(3):381-99.
  26. Virkki R, Juven T, Mertsola J, Ruuskanen O. Radiographic follow-up of pneumonia in children. Pediatr Pulmonol 2005;40(3):223-7.

Disclaimer: The recommendations in this position statement do not indicate an exclusive course of treatment or procedure to be followed. Variations, taking into account individual circumstances, may be appropriate. Internet addresses are current at time of publication.