Preventing choking and suffocation in children
Posted: Feb 1 2012
The Canadian Paediatric Society gives permission to print single copies of this document from our website. For permission to reprint or reproduce multiple copies, please see our copyright policy.
C Cyr; Canadian Paediatric Society, Injury Prevention Committee
Abridged version: Paediatr Child Health 2012;17(2):91-2
Choking, suffocation, and strangulation cause serious unintentional injuries in children and are leading causes of unintentional death in infants and toddlers. Nearly all choking, suffocation and strangulation deaths and injuries are preventable. The present statement reviews definitions, epidemiology and effective prevention strategies for these injuries. Recommendations that combine approaches for improving safety, including research, surveillance, legislation and standards, product design and education, are made. Paediatric health care providers should be encouraging parents and other caregivers to learn CPR and choking first aid, as well as offering anticipatory, age-appropriate guidance to prevent these injuries, at regular health visits.
Key Words: Anticipatory guidance; Choking; Injury prevention; Strangulation; Suffocation
Choking, suffocation and strangulation are important causes of unintentional injuries in children and rank as leading causes of unintentional injury deaths in infants and toddlers . Choking and suffocation are responsible for almost 40% of unintentional injuries in infants under the age of one in Canada . For every choking-related death, there are an estimated 110 children treated in hospital emergency departments . The number of children receiving first aid or outpatient assessment for significant choking incidents in the community is unknown. Morbidity associated with these injuries can be significant, including anoxic brain injury and esophageal perforation . Virtually all choking and suffocation deaths and injuries can be prevented.
Deaths due to choking, suffocation, strangulation or entrapment are the result of asphyxia, a lack of oxygen supply to the brain. Asphyxia may also occur in enclosed spaces, such as a toy box, old refrigerator or freezer, a grain silo, or the trunk of a car.
Choking is the interruption of respiration by an internal obstruction of the airway, usually a food item or small object.
Aspiration occurs when this object is inhaled into the respiratory system.
Suffocation is obstruction of the airway by an external object that blocks the nose and mouth, such as a plastic bag, bedding, or mattress.
Strangulation is external constriction of the neck that interferes with respiration, and may be caused by a curtain cord or clothing drawstring.
Entrapment refers to mechanical interference with respiration when the head and neck are caught in a constricting place or position, such as a gap in play equipment, a bunk bed barrier, between balcony rails, or in a car window.
Traumatic (crush) asphyxia occurs when there is mechanical fixation of the chest, by fallen furniture, for example, or closing garage door, or by burial in soil, grain or other materials. Entrapment can result in suffocation, strangulation or asphyxia.
Children younger than three years of age are at highest risk of mechanical airway obstruction because their airway development is still incomplete and eating can be difficult at this developmental age and stage.Young children lack the ability to consistently and effectively chew food into manageable pieces. The swallowing mechanism is still underdeveloped, and they lack the experience to prevent or abort a potential choking episode . Studies of mouthing behaviour show that children younger than three years of age put more things in their mouth—and keep them there for longer—than any other age group, with children under one year of age mouthing the widest variety and number of items. At this age, virtually any item a child comes into contact with is mouthed .
Foreign body ingestion/aspiration is the fourth leading cause of injury hospitalizations and deaths in children younger than four years of age. Incidence peaks at nine to 11 months of age, declining thereafter . The majority of choking and suffocation deaths occur in the first year of life, with the majority of hospitalizations occurring in the first three years and an elevated risk of hospitalization persisting until six years of age . Deaths from choking occur in the home environment in up to 95% of cases . The presence of older siblings in the household increases the risk for choking, possibly because toys and other objects with small parts are more likely to be present and caregiving activities, such as feeding, to be undertaken by older siblings .
Specific patterns of suffocation and choking vary by severity of injury and by age. Studies of asphyxia incidents in children 0 to 14 years of age in Australia documented that fatal events were caused by strangulation in 38% of cases, by entrapment of the head and neck in 31%, by foreign body aspiration in 19%, and by facial occlusion in 12% . Children older than one year of age were typically injured by strangulation, while infants were more at risk for the other three injury types. For nonfatal injuries, 95% of hospitalizations and 87% of emergency department visits were due to aspiration. Food and non-food items were equally represented in hospitalizations, whereas foods (61%) and coins were the most common items implicated in emergency department visits .
Foods and latex balloons are involved in a significant proportion of choking cases -- (Table 1). Most foods implicated are small, round or cylindrical in shape, conforming to the contours of a child’s airway (eg, hot dog rounds, whole grapes, carrot slices, peanuts, seeds and hard candy) (Table 2). Latex balloons are the principal nonfood item causing choking deaths in children, implicated in 29% of nonfood-related choking deaths reported to the United States Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) between 1972 and 1992 . Between 1982 and 1995 at least six children two to nine years of age died due to balloon aspiration in Canada . Death due to choking on examination gloves given to children in clinicians’ offices has also been reported . Coins are the leading nonfood product implicated in nonfatal foreign body ingestion, but they usually do not cause true choking in children -. They become lodged in the esophagus and may need to be removed endoscopically. A swallowed coin is the most common cause of hospitalization for this type of injury.
Choking and suffocation hazards in the home
Round, smooth objects under 4 cm (1.5 in) in diameter are particularly hazardous, as well as conformable items such as balloons*
Pull-cords longer than 20 cm (8 in), or any dangling or loose cords that is attached to a fixed object
Household items that might cover the nose and mouth and obstruct breathing
Places with a poor air supply, a heavy lid or a self-latching door, or spaces measuring between 9-22.9 cm (3.3-9 in) rungs or rails
suspended toys or mobiles in the crib or playpen
In the crib: soft toys, bedding, bumper pads, pets
toy boxes or chests
* Any household item that can be passed through an empty toilet paper roll—which closely approximates the size of the testing cylinder in the small parts standard—is a choking hazard.
Preventing choking when feeding infants and toddlers
Foods to avoid for children under 4 years of age
Foods requiring special preparation
hard candies, cough drops
grapes – slice lengthwise
Source: Reference 
Small parts standards have been developed to identify toys and children’s products that present a choking hazard, although children still choke on objects which pass these tests -. Standards determine the warnings seen on toys and other children’s products (eg, “Not suitable for children under age three”). The US federal Hazardous Substances Act specifies a test of object-size using the Small Parts Test Fixture (SPTF), a cylinder with a diameter of 3.17 cm and a depth between 2.54 cm and 5.71 cm. An empty toilet paper roll closely approximates this size and can be used to assess choking hazards in the home; if an item is small enough to pass through the cylinder, it is a choking hazard.
Suffocation and strangulation
Child deaths caused by suffocating in a crib, waterbed, bunk bed or toy box, and by strangling on a drapery or pacifier cord, or on playground equipment, are still being reported in Canada . General patterns in “mechanical suffocation” differ by age. Older children are typically injured by hanging during play . Infants are more often injured in the sleep environment, by becoming wedged (40%), facial occlusion (24%), overlying (8%), entrapment with suspension (7%), and hanging (5%) . Hollow hemispherical or egg-shaped containers that can cover a child’s nose and mouth, creating a seal, are particularly hazardous for young children at play or in their crib (eg, toys, lids, containers) .
The importance of a safe sleep environment is now well established in the literature, especially of having a crib that meets current safety standards, that has a firm, tight-fitting mattress and no soft bedding . Altmann documented that 40% of unintentional asphyxial deaths in children under 15 years of age are related to the child’s own bed or bed accessories, to an inappropriate sleep location (eg, a sofa, adult bed), or to having furniture, cords, or other hazardous objects in the sleep environment . Canada has had strict crib safety regulations in force since 1986, but 12 deaths and seven hospitalizations due to mechanical suffocation in beds, cribs and cradles were reported in Canada in 1990-1992. About two-thirds of these deaths were associated with cribs, either because they did not meet current standards or had damaged mattress supports or crib sides. Other fatal bed injuries implicate bunk beds and toddler beds with guardrails . Nakamura has documented a variety of potentially fatal hazards associated with adult beds, including wedging between the mattress and wall, entrapment between the mattress and bed frame or adjacent furniture, strangulation between bed railings and suffocation on waterbeds . Parents of young children or of a child with special needs may use a toddler beds with rails, or modify a bed to prevent a fall; such devices and modifications can be hazardous, and have been implicated in injury deaths .
In older children, strangulation is the most common cause of fatal asphyxial injury. Window blind cords and drawstrings on clothing are prominent causes for this type of injury, with regulatory implications discussed below. Older children have been strangled while playing with ropes and cords, such as by tying a skipping rope to a play structure or tree branch . Another less common but potentially fatal cause of asphyxia is entrapment: in hide-a-beds , electrically-operated garage doors, and in car windows or trunks .
Between 1991 and 2000, 160 fatal window blind cord strangulations were reported to the US CPSC, including 140 incidents associated with the outer pull-cords and 20 with the inner cords that run through blind slats. Outer pull-cord incidents involved children eight months to six years of age, with babies accessing cords from their crib and toddlers and older children injured by playing with loose cords. Inner cord incidents occurred in children nine to 17 months of age who were in a crib or playpen within reach of blind cords. Through largely voluntary efforts by the window covering industry, window blinds sold since 1995 do not have outer cords that form a loop, and blinds sold since November 2000 have been redesigned so that the inner cord cannot be pulled into a loop -. Current corded window covering product regulations place further restrictions on the formation of cord loops and require warning labels. However, they still do not address certain hazards posed by Roman shades and roll-up blinds. While design modifications have eliminated certain types of blind cord hazards, there is still a significant risk of strangulation. Parents and caregivers need to eliminate loose or dangling cords by cutting them short and by anchoring any remaining.
Drawstrings on children’s clothing can get caught on playground equipment, a bus door, farm machinery, or crib structure, causing strangulation . Between 1985 and 1999 the CPSC received reports of 22 fatal and 48 nonfatal incidents involving drawstrings . Two-thirds of these incidents involved the hood/neck drawstrings of upper outerwear in children between two and eight years of age, typically by getting caught on playground slides. The remaining incidents involved waist-area drawstrings and children between seven and 14 years of age who were caught and dragged or run over when their drawstrings became caught on the school bus door or handrail. In 1996 the CPSC published industry guidelines for drawstrings and closures on children’s outerwear which were then incorporated in a voluntary American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) standard (1997). Drawstrings are not regulated in Canada, and voluntary compliance with the ASTM standard is inconsistent.
Virtually all deaths and serious injuries from choking, suffocation and strangulation are preventable. Due to the higher burden among younger children, the target age for many prevention efforts is the first four years of life . Prevention strategies addressing suffocation and choking hazards should include regulatory standards for baby and child product design/manufacture, appropriate labelling practices and public education.
The regulation of baby and baby/child products and equipment usually focuses on design and labelling practices. Specific suffocation and choking hazards that are regulated in some jurisdictions include drapery cords, cribs, refrigerators and freezers, drawstrings, and even plastic bags. The Canadian Hazardous Products Act contains a number of requirements that protect children from certain choking and suffocation hazards . For packaging of children’s toys and products, bags that have an opening of 35.6 cm (14 in) or larger must carry a specific suffocation hazard warning and cannot be made of flexible film (eg, a dry cleaning-type bag). Any toy box or play structure large enough for a child to enter that can be closed by a lid or door must have openings on two or more adjacent sides. Cribs, cradles, playpens and baby gates have performance and labelling criteria to prevent mechanical suffocation hazards.
Any toy that is likely to be used by a child younger than three years of age must pass a small parts test. Small hard eyes and noses on dolls and plush toys must withstand a pull of 9 kg (20 lbs) for five min. Rattles and pacifiers have specific requirements to prevent choking and suffocation. Consumer warnings are recommended for balloons and for crib toys that are strung across a crib or playpen; notably, these warnings are voluntary. While bunk beds, children’s clothing with drawstrings and window blind cords are not fully regulated, Health Canada has undertaken efforts to educate manufacturers and consumers regarding these hazards.
In a study from the mid-eighties, Kraus evaluated the effectiveness of three regulatory strategies in reducing suffocation deaths: the Refrigerator Safety Act (1958), US federal crib regulations, and California state legislation requiring plastic bag warnings . A sharp decline in suffocation deaths was documented in the early 1960s, followed by a plateau and gradual decline to the early 1980s. These declines, however, could not be exclusively attributed to legislation, because reduced exposure and increased parental supervision are also possible explanations. In Canada, incidents of asphyxiation in abandoned refrigerators, suffocation by plastic bags and entrapment of a child’s head between crib slats have also declined significantly since federal regulations were introduced. Likewise, Health Canada’s efforts to educate manufacturers and consumers about the dangers of drawstrings have paralleled a decrease in drawstring-related fatalities . However, children’s clothing with drawstrings is still available on the market despite advocacy for product regulation to prohibit their sale . In Ireland, where drawstrings were banned on children’s outerwear in 1976, few garments adhere to the safety standard .
One study examining the wording commonly used for labelling age-appropriate toys has documented that consumers are more likely to avoid purchasing a toy with small parts when the label warns of a specific hazard (choking) rather than specifying an appropriate age group (eg, “For children three years and older”) .
Parental education by physicians has been shown to improve certain safety practices, such as motor vehicle restraint use, installing smoke alarms, and lowering hot water temperature in home faucets . General “childproofing” or “home safety” education, including measures to prevent choking and suffocation, does not seem to be as consistently effective at improving safety practices or reducing injury rates, although individual studies have documented significant changes -. Safety education is thought to be most effective when it is combined with strategies to change behaviour . Targeted, simple, action-oriented messaging is to be encouraged, along with periodic reinforcement.
Home visitation programs have been evaluated for their effectiveness in preventing injuries. A review of 11 randomized controlled trials showed a significant preventive effect on the occurrence of childhood injury . A randomized controlled trial of a home visit combined with providing an injury prevention kit showed that this strategy was effective in reducing hazards in the home, including choking and suffocation hazards . A Canadian multicentre randomized controlled trial of a single home visit with providing safety information, coupons, and home safety counselling resulted in significantly fewer injury visits, but did not result in long-term adoption of home safety measures .
Research and surveillance
Data regarding the circumstances of fatal and near-miss choking and suffocation incidents are essential for identifying new hazards as well as for monitoring the effectiveness of existing or future regulatory and educational strategies. Detailed data, including narrative descriptions of events and products involved, are available only through specialized surveillance programs such as the Canadian Hospitals Injury Reporting and Prevention Program and the proposed National Coroners’ Database. These systems are necessary for future research and surveillance related to product safety.
Legislation and standards
For some existing legislation and standards, data are lacking regarding compliance and effectiveness. For example, while a Canadian standard for play spaces and equipment exists that addresses many potential entrapment risks, the degree of uptake and application by communities and its effectiveness in preventing serious injuries are not known. Standards for play equipment for preschool-aged children are lacking, and should be developed.
- Nationally, the CPS recommends revising the Hazardous Products Act to include known hazards which are not currently regulated but are associated with fatal and near-fatal incidents, such as bunk beds, toddler bed guardrails, children’s clothing with drawstrings, and window covering cords.
- At the provincial level, the CPS recommends that day care regulators integrate safety guidelines, including measures that prevent choking, suffocation and strangulation.
- At the municipal level, the CPS recommends that communities and school boards mandate the use of the (now voluntary) Canadian Standards Association guidelines for play spaces and playground equipment.
Considering that improved product design, labelling and packaging could significantly impact children’s exposure to choking and suffocation hazards, the CPS recommends that manufacturers and designers of baby and children’s products and children’s facilities use guidance documents such as the ISO Guide 50, which summarizes injury risks, including entrapment, suffocation and choking, in their design and production processes . The use of plastic wrap, plastic bags and other choking hazards in the packaging of products for young children should be reduced or eliminated wherever possible. Labelling of children’s toys and products should clearly identify a specific risk, rather than simply making an age recommendation.
During health visits, paediatric health care professionals should be educating parents and other caregivers (child care providers, babysitters, grandparents) about choking/suffocation prevention as appropriate for their child’s age/developmental stage (see Table 3). Community public health programs should distribute choking prevention information to child care providers. Babysitting courses should include instruction on preventing choking and treatment protocols (see below).
Basic preventive choking and suffocation strategies
Newborn to two months
At 4 to 6 months
Continue taking all the preventive measures outlined above, PLUS:
At 6 to 12 months
Continue taking all the preventive measures outlined above, PLUS:
Preschool (1 to 4 years)
Continue taking all the preventive measures outlined above, PLUS:
Parents and caregivers should be encouraged to take CPR and choking first aid (infant/child CPR) courses, offered by local Heart and Stroke Foundation offices (1-888-HSF-INFO), St. John Ambulance or the Red Cross. The infant/child course is geared to child care workers, teachers, babysitters, lifeguards and parents. Paediatric health care providers, particularly prehospital care providers and those serving remote communities, should maintain their advanced paediatric resuscitation knowledge and skills. Basic Rescuer training should be supplemented by Pediatric Advanced Life Support training, with periodic updates and review, as recommended by the American Heart Association .
For more information about injury risks, prevention and life-saving skills, visit the following websites:
- Safe Kids Canada: www.safekidscanada.ca
- Health Canada: www.hc-sc.gc.ca
- Heart and Stroke Foundation of Canada: www.heartandstroke.ca
- American Heart Association: www.heart.org
The author wishes to thank a former member of the Injury Prevention Committee, Dr. Bich Nguyen, for her work on earlier drafts of this position statement.
INJURY PREVENTION COMMITTEE
Members: Claude Cyr MD; Brent E Hagel PhD; I Barry Pless MD; Jeffrey W Scott MD; Natalie L Yanchar MD (chair); Mitchell Zelman MD (board representative)
Liaisons: Dominic Allain MD, Paediatric Emergency Medicine Section, Canadian Paediatric Society; Pamela Fuselli, Safe Kids Canada; Gail Salminen, Health Canada, Consumer Product Safety Bureau; Robin Skinner, Public Health Agency of Canada; Anne-Marie Ugnat, Public Health Agency of Canada (2008-2010)
Consultants: Matthew John Bowes MD; Amy Ornstein MD; Lynne J Warda MD
Principal author: Claude Cyr MD
- Health Canada. Canadian injury data: Mortality 2005 and Hospitalizations, 2001-2005. Ottawa: Government of Canada, 2011.
- Beaulne G; Health Canada. For the Safety of Canadian Children and Youth: From Injury Data to Preventive Measures. Ottawa: Government of Canada, 1997.
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Nonfatal choking-related episodes among children—United States, 2001. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2002;51(42):945-8.
- Altmann AE, Ozanne-Smith J. Non-fatal asphyxiation and foreign body ingestion in children 0-14 years. Inj Prev 1997;3(3):176-82.
- Tarrago SB. Prevention of choking, strangulation, and suffocation in childhood. WMJ 2000;99(9):43-6, 42.
- International Organization for Standardization. Guide 50: Safety aspects - Guidelines for child safety. Geneva: ISO/IEC, 2002.
- Byard RW, Hanson KA, James RA. Fatal unintentional traumatic asphyxia in childhood. J Paediatr Child Health 2003;39(1):31-2.
- Strauss RH, Thompson JE, Macasaet A. Accidental strangulation by a motor vehicle window. Pediatr Emerg Care 1997;13(5):345-6.
- Smith SA, Norris B. Reducing the risk of choking hazards: Mouthing behaviour of children aged 1 month to 5 years. Inj Control Saf Promot 2003;10(3):145-54.
- Agran PF, Anderson C, Winn D, Trent R, Walton-Haynes L, Thayer S. Rates of pediatric injuries by 3-month intervals for children 0 to 3 years of age. Pediatrics 2003;111(6 Pt 1):e683-92.
- Altmann A, Nolan T. Non-intentional asphyxiation deaths due to upper airway interference in children 0 to 14 years. Inj Prev 1995;1(2):76-80.
- Reilly JS, Cook SP, Stool D, Rider G. Prevention and management of aerodigestive foreign body injuries in childhood. Pediatr Clin North Am 1996;43(6):1403-11.
- Rimell FL, Thome A Jr, Stool S, et al. Characteristics of objects that cause choking in children. JAMA 1995;274(22):1763-6.
- Harris CS, Baker SP, Smith GA, Harris RM. Childhood asphyxiation by food. A national analysis and overview. JAMA 1984;251(17):2231-5.
- Ryan CA, Yacoub W, Paton T, Avard D. Childhood deaths from toy balloons. Am J Dis Child 1990;144(11):1221-4.
- Friedman EM. Tracheobronchial foreign bodies. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 2000;33(1):179-85.
- Reilly JS. Prevention of aspiration in infants and young children: Federal regulations. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1990;99(4 Pt 1):273-6.
- Reilly JS, Walter MA, Beste D, et al. Size/shape analysis of aerodigestive foreign bodies in children: A multi-institutional study. Am J Otolaryngol 1995;16(3):190-3.
- Rider G, Wilson CL. Small parts aspiration, ingestion, and choking in small children: Findings of the small parts research project. Risk Anal 1996;16(3):321-30.
- Wyatt JP, Wyatt PW, Squires TJ, Busuttil A. Hanging deaths in children. Am J Forensic Med Pathol 1998;19(4):343-6.
- Drago DA, Dannenberg AL. Infant mechanical suffocation deaths in the United States, 1980-1997. Pediatrics 1999;103(5):e59.
- Nakamura SW, Pollack-Nelson C, Chidekel AS. Suction-type suffocation incidents in infants and toddlers. Pediatrics 2003;111(1):e12-6.
- Kraus JF. Effectiveness of measures to prevent unintentional deaths of infants and children from suffocation and strangulation. Public Health Rep 1985;100(2):231-40.
- Feldman KW, Simms RJ. Strangulation in childhood: Epidemiology and clinical course. Pediatrics 1980;65(6):1079-85.
- Nakamura S, Wind M, Danello MA. Review of hazards associated with children placed in adult beds. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 1999;153(10):1019-23.
- Amanuel B, Byard RW. Accidental asphyxia in bed in severely disabled children. J Paediatr Child Health 2000;36(1):66-8.
- Cavanaugh RM Jr. ‘Hide-a-bed’ hideaways: A potential source of entrapment. Pediatrics 1982;70(4):598-9.
- Byard RW, James RA. Car window entrapment and accidental childhood asphyxia. J Paediatr Child Health 2001;37(2):201-2.
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Fatal car trunk entrapment involving children—United States, 1987-1998. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 1998;47(47):1019-22.
- United States Consumer Product Safety Commission. Are Your Window Coverings Safe? Washington, DC: CPSC, 2009.
- Rauchschwalbe R, Mann NC. Pediatric window-cord strangulations in the United States, 1981-1995. JAMA 1997;277(21):1696-8.
- United States Consumer Product Safety Commission. CPSC Announces October as Window Covering Safety Month: Consumers Urged to Repair or Replace Old Window Coverings. Washington: CPSC, September 30, 2003.
- O’Sullivan J, Ryan CA. No strings attached: Preventing deaths from children’s clothing. Arch Dis Child 1999;81(3):282-3.
- United States Consumer Product Safety Commission. Guidelines for Drawstrings on Children’s Upper Outerwear. Washington: CPSC, September 1999.
- Health Canada. Industry Guide to Canadian Safety Requirements for Toys and Related Products, 2006. Ottawa: Government of Canada, 2006.
- Health Canada. Quick Reference Guide to the Hazardous Products Act for Manufacturers, Importers, Distributors and Retailers - 2009. Ottawa: Government of Canada, 2009.
- Farquhar BJ. What makes regulation work? Inj Prev 1998;4(4):253-6.
- Yee WH. Blind to the danger? CMAJ 1998;159(3):217-8.
- Langlois JA, Wallen BA, Teret SP, Bailey LA, Hershey JH, Peeler MO. The impact of specific toy warning labels. JAMA 1991;265(21):2848-50.
- DiGuiseppi C, Roberts IG. Individual-level injury prevention strategies in the clinical setting. Future Child 2000;10(1):53-82.
- Bass JL, Christoffel KK, Widome M, et al. Childhood injury prevention counseling in primary care settings: A critical review of the literature. Pediatrics 1993;92(4):544-50.
- Clamp M, Kendrick D. A randomised controlled trial of general practitioner safety advice for families with children under 5 years. BMJ 1998;316(7144):1576-9.
- Dowswell T, Towner EM, Simpson G, Jarvis SN. Preventing childhood unintentional injuries—what works? A literature review. Inj Prev 1996;2(2):140-9.
- Towner E, Dowswell T, Jarvis S. Updating the evidence. A systematic review of what works in preventing childhood unintentional injuries: Part 1. Inj Prev 2001;7(2):161-4.
- Towner E, Dowswell T, Jarvis S. Updating the evidence. A systemic review of what works in preventing childhood unintentional injuries: Part 2. Inj Prev 2001;7(3):249-53.
- Gielen AC, Sleet D. Application of behavior-change theories and methods to injury prevention. Epidemiol Rev 2003;25:65-76.
- Roberts I, Kramer MS, Suissa S. Does home visiting prevent childhood injury? A systematic review of randomised controlled trials. BMJ 1996;312(7022):29-33.
- Sznajder M, Leduc S, Janvrin MP, et al. Home delivery of an injury prevention kit for children in four French cities: A controlled randomized trial. Inj Prev 2003;9(3):261-5.
- King WJ, Klassen TP, LeBlanc J, et al. The effectiveness of a home visit to prevent childhood injury. Pediatrics 2001;108(2):382-8.
- Grenier D, Leduc D. (Eds.) Well Beings: A Guide to Health in Child Care. Third edition. Ottawa: Canadian Paediatric Society, 2008:37-8.
Disclaimer: The recommendations in this position statement do not indicate an exclusive course of treatment or procedure to be followed. Variations, taking into account individual circumstances, may be appropriate. Internet addresses are current at time of publication.