Skip to Content
Canadian Paediatric Society

Practice Point

Azithromycin use in paediatrics: A practical overview

Posted: Jun 7 2013 | Reaffirmed: Feb 1 2016


The Canadian Paediatric Society gives permission to print single copies of this document from our website. For permission to reprint or reproduce multiple copies, please see our copyright policy.

Principal author(s)

Philippe Ovetchkine, Michael J Rieder; Canadian Paediatric Society, Drug Therapy and Hazardous Substances Committee

Paediatr Child Health 2013;18(6):311-3

Abstract

Azithromycin is an antibiotic that is commonly prescribed for upper  and lower respiratory tract infections in children. While it has proven benefits, some concerns regarding azithromycin use have arisen in recent years. This practice point considers azithromycin therapy for acute respiratory infections in otherwise healthy children. Pharmacokinetics, spectrum of activity, the problem of resistant bacteria and clinical aspects are considered, along with recommendations for use and contraindications. Azithromycin should be avoided in patients with a significant risk of bacteremia. It is associated with pneumococcal resistance and, with stated exceptions, is generally not recommended for the treatment of acute pharyngitis, acute otitis media or pneumococcal community-acquired pneumonia in the paediatric population.

Key Words: Antibiotics; Azithromycin; Infections; Macrolides; Resistance; Treatment

Azithromycin, the first azalide from the macrolide class of antibiotics, has rapidly become one of the more common antibiotics prescribed by paediatricians, particularly for respiratory infections.[1][2] Azithromycin is easily administered to children as an oral suspension, with once-a-day dosing for a relatively short treatment duration (three to five days) and a favourable side effect profile.

Emerging pneumococcal resistance to penicillin in recent years, the recognition that resistance can lead to more serious complications and the identification of atypical bacteria causing respiratory infections are trends that have prompted some experts to recommend macrolides as first-line therapy for community-acquired pneumonia among ambulatory patients.[3][4] While developed for adults, these recommendations have had an important impact on the prescription of macrolides, in particular azithromycin, in paediatric practice. In the 20 years since the first trials supporting its market registration, however, some concerns have arisen regarding the use of azithromycin in children.

This practice point considers the use of azithromycin for upper and lower respiratory tract acute infections in healthy children in Canada. The use of azithromycin for other conditions (such as cystic fibrosis, HIV-AIDS or other chronic illnesses, in travellers to other countries or in patients with sexually transmitted infections) is beyond the scope of this review.

Pharmacokinetics

Compared with other macrolides, the distinctive pharmacokinetic properties of azithromycin have facilitated administration; it is stable in acidic pH, has a bioavailability >30%, and has a relatively long half-life of up to 96 h.[5] Azithromycin also has a superior pattern of distribution, with significant diffusion to the intracellular compartment and polymorphonuclear neutrophils, and can reach intracellular concentrations up to 100 times higher than the plasma concentration.[6] High drug concentrations within phagocytes partially confer azithromycin with its efficacy for treating intracellular infectious agents. This quality is also the basis for using a five-day treatment for acute pharyngitis and otitis media.[7]

Breakthrough pneumococcal bacteremia in patients undergoing treatment with azithromycin has been described, which is not surprising given that the drug is largely transported within cells rather than in the circulating blood.[8][9] The occurrence of intravascular pneumococcal infections despite treatment suggests that azithromycin should be avoided in patients with significant risk of bacteremia.[4][9]

Spectrum of activity

Similar to other macrolides, azithromycin inhibits bacterial protein synthesis by binding to the 50S subunit of ribosomes and blocking protein translocation. However, unlike macrolides, such as erythromycin, azithromycin has lower in vitro activity against Gram-positive bacteria, including Streptococcus pneumoniae, but better in vitro activity against Gram-negative bacteria such as Haemophilus influenzae and Moraxella catarrhalis.

Upper and lower respiratory tract infections are by far the most common indications for azithromycin prescription in children in Western countries.[10] However, respiratory micro-organism susceptibility has changed over time, and increasing use of macrolides, including azithromycin, is associated with a growing number of pneumococcal strains becoming resistant to macrolides.[4][11]-[14] Pneumococcal resistance to macrolides has become more common than resistance to penicillin.[4] Furthermore, the strains that are resistant to penicillin are almost always resistant to macrolides as well.

Macrolide resistance is variable in Canada. Since infant vaccination with heptavalent-conjugated pneumococcal vaccine, the prevalence of pneumococcal strains that are not susceptible to erythromycin, isolated in children with invasive pneumococcal diseases, has decreased from 8.8% to 5.8% in Alberta.[15] In Quebec, however, 23% of pneumococcal strains responsible for invasive infections were resistant to erythromycin,[16] suggesting that several factors – including prescribing patterns – play a role in the emergence of antimicrobial resistance.

The problem of resistant bacteria

Suboptimal use of antibacterial medications is the most important reason for the emergence and spread of macrolide-resistant pneumococci. Incorrect practices include using antibiotics to treat nonbacterial infections (often viral in origin), under- or overprescribing (eg, administering an antibiotic with a suboptimal spectrum of activity or, conversely, an antibiotic with too broad a spectrum coverage), inappropriate dosing or prescribing for the wrong treatment length.[4][17] Misusing azithromycin has important consequences on the nasopharyngeal carriage of pneumococci. The antibiotic exerts a selection pressure enhanced by its own pharmacokinetic characteristics: the long half-life of azithromycin results in subinhibitory concentrations at carriage sites over a period of several days and promotes the emergence of resistant strains. Many studies have reported a link between the administration of macrolides and nasopharyngeal carriage of resistant pneumococci.[18][19] In Portugal, the use of azithromycin was correlated with the emergence of macrolide-resistant pneumococci.[20]

Clinical aspects

Current azithromycin use is based on its pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic characteristics as well as its proven efficacy in therapeutic clinical trials. In paediatrics, it is predominantly used to treat both upper respiratory tract infections (eg, acute pharyngitis and acute otitis media) and lower respiratory tract infections (community-acquired pneumonia),[10] illnesses for which S pneumoniae is a principal cause of morbidity and mortality.

For acute otitis media, one randomized clinical trial comparing azithromycin with a high dose (90 mg/kg/day/6.4 mg/kg/day) of amoxicillin-clavulanate combination showed that treatment with the beta-lactam antibiotic achieved a higher rate of clinical recovery and bacterial eradication of resistant strains of both pneumococcus and H influenzae.[21]

The main problems with using azithromycin to treat acute otitis media are recurrent resistant pneumococcal strains and a suboptimal clinical efficacy against H influenzae, determined by bacterial eradication levels in middle-ear fluid.[22][23] Consequently, the American Academy of Pediatrics does not recommend the use of azithromycin for acute otitis media in children unless a child has an anaphylactic allergy to penicillin.[7]

For analogous reasons, similar recommendations should likely apply when treating pneumococcal community-acquired pneumonia. A recent Canadian Paediatric Society practice point on treating pneumonia in healthy Canadian children reserved azithromycin for children with suspected atypical pneumonia and as an adjunct to cefotaxime (or ceftriaxone) in cases of severe pneumonia.[24] Beyond the risk of resistance, the very low plasma concentrations of azithromycin may increase the risk of serious therapeutic failure.

Conclusion

Azithromycin should not be used to treat acute pharyngitis, acute otitis media or community-acquired pneumonia in otherwise healthy children, except in the following cases:

  • Azithromycin should be used as a second-line treatment in cases of life-threatening beta-lactam allergy, to treat acute pharyngitis caused by macrolide-sensitive group A beta-hemolytic streptococcus.
  • Azithromycin should be considered for treating pneumonia caused by atypical bacteria. While definitive evidence for this use remains insufficient, azithromycin is recommended for this indication in Canadian and United States guidelines. Azithromycin should be considered for treating nonsevere pneumonia with primary features of atypical bacterial pneumonia: subacute onset, prominent cough, minimal leukocytosis and a nonlobar infiltrate, usually in a school-aged child.

Acknowledgements

This practice point has been reviewed by the Community Paediatrics and Infectious Diseases and Immunization Committees of the Canadian Paediatric Society.


CPS DRUG THERAPY AND HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES COMMITTEE

Members: Mark L Bernstein MD; Ran D Goldman MD; Robert Moriartey MD (Board Representative); Philippe Ovetchkine MD; Michael J Rieder MD (Chair)
Liaisons: Daniel L Keene MD, Health Canada; Doreen M Matsui, Canadian Society of Pharmacology and Therapeutics
Principal authors: Philippe Ovetchkine MD; Michael J Rieder MD


References

  1. Marra F, Patrick DM, Chong M, Bowie WR. Antibiotic use among children in British Columbia, Canada. J Antimicrob Chemother 2006;58(4):830-9.
  2. Marra F, Monnet DL, Patrick DM, et al. A comparison of antibiotic use in children between Canada and Denmark. Ann Pha rmacother 2007;41(4):659-6.
  3. Niederman MS, Bass JB Jr, Campbell GD, et al. Guidelines for the initial management of adults with community-acquired pneumonia: Diagnosis, assessment of severity, and initial antimicrobial therapy. American Thoracic Society. Medical Section of the American Lung Association. Am Rev Respir Dis 1993;148(5):1418-26.
  4. Klugman KP, Lonks JR. Hidden epidemic of macrolide-resistant pneumococci. Emerg Infect Dis 2005;11(6):802-7.
  5. Stevens RC, Reed MD, Shenep JL, et al. Pharmacokinetics of azithromycin after single- and multiple-doses in children. Pharmacotherapy 1997;17(5):874-80.
  6. Wilms EB, Touw DJ, Heijerman HG. Pharmacokinetics of azithromycin in plasma, blood, polymorphonuclear neutrophils and sputum during long-term therapy in patients with cystic fibrosis. Ther Drug Monit 2006;28:219-25.
  7. American Academy of Pediatrics, Subcommittee on Management of Acute Otitis Media. Diagnosis and management of acute otitis media. Pediatrics 2004;113(5):1451-65: pediatrics.aappublications.org/content/113/5/1451.full (Accessed April 15, 2013).
  8. Fogarty C, Goldschmidt R, Bush K. Bacteremic pneumonia due to multidrug-resistant pneumococci in 3 patients treated unsuccessfully with azithromycin and successfully with levofloxacin. Clin Infect Dis 2000;31(5):613-5.
  9. Kelley MA, Weber DJ, Gilligan P, Cohen MS. Breakthrough pneumococcal bacteremia in patients being treated with azithromycin and clarithromycin. Clin Infect Dis 2000;31(4):1008-11.
  10. Hersh AL, Shapiro DJ, Pavia AT, Shah SS. Antibiotic prescribing in ambulatory pediatrics in the United States. Pediatrics 2011;128(6):1053-61.
  11. Felmingham D, Reinert RR, Hirakata Y, Rodloff A. Increasing prevalence of antimicrobial resistance among isolates of Streptococcus pneumoniae from the PROTEKT surveillance study, and compatative in vitro activity of the ketolide, telithromycin. J Antimicrob Chemother 2002;50(Suppl S1):25-37.
  12. Reinert RR. Resistance phenotypes and multi-drug resistance in Streptococcus pneumoniae (PROTEKT years 1-3 [1999-20021). J Chemother 2004;16 Suppl 6:35-48.
  13. Jenkins SG, Brown SD, Farrell DJ. Trends in antibacterial resistance among Streptococcus pneumoniae isolated in the USA: Update from PROTEKT US Years 1-4. Ann Clin Microbiol Antimicrob 2008;7:1.
  14. Daneman N, McGeer A, Green K, Low DE; Toronto Invasive Bacterial Diseases Network. Macrolide resistance in bacteremic pneumococcal disease: Implications for patient management. Clin Infect Dis 2006;43(4):432-8.
  15. Tyrrell GJ, Lovgren M, Chui N, et al. Serotypes and antimicrobial susceptibilities of invasive Streptococcus pneumoniae pre- and post-seven valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine introduction in Alberta, Canada, 2000-2006. Vaccine 2009;27(27):3553-60.
  16. Crisinel PA, Chevalier I, Rallu F, et al. Invasive pneumococcal disease after implementation of a reduced three-dose pneumococcal conjugate vaccine program: A pediatric tertiary care center experience. Eur J Pediatr 2010;169(11):1311-5.
  17. Lieberman JM. Appropriate antibiotic use and why it is important: The challenges of bacterial resistance. Pediatr Infect Dis J 2003;22(12):1143-51.
  18. Leach AJ, Shelby-James TM, Mayo M, et al. A prospective study of the impact of community-based azithromycin treatment of trachoma on carriage and resistance of Streptococcus pneumoniae. Clin Infect Dis 1997;24(3):356-62.
  19. Baquero F. Evolving resistance patterns of Streptococcus pneumoniae: A link with long-acting macrolide consumption? J Chemother 1999;11 Suppl 1:35-43.
  20. Dias R, Caniça M. Emergence of invasive erythromycin-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae strains in Portugal: Contribution and phylogenetic relatedness of serotype 14. J Antimicrob Chemother 2004;54(6):1035-9.
  21. Hoberman A, Dagan R, Leibovitz E, et al. Large dosage amoxicillin/clavulanate, compared with azithromycin, for the treatment of bacterial acute otitis media in children. Pediatr Infect Dis J 2005;24(6):525-32.
  22. Dagan R, Johnson CE, McLinn S, et al. Bacteriologic and clinical efficacy of amoxicillin/clavulanate vs. azithromycin in acute otitis media. Pediatr Infect Dis J 2000;19(2):95-104. (Erratum in Pediatr Infect Dis J 2000;19[4]:275).
  23. Dagan R, Leibovitz E, Fliss DM, et al. Bacteriologic efficacies of oral azithromycin and oral cefaclor in treatment of acute otitis media in infants and young children. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2000;44(1):43-50.
  24. Canadian Paediatric Society, Infectious Diseases and Immunization Committee. Pneumonia in healthy Canadian children and youth: Practice Points for management (Principal authors Le Saux N, Robinson JL). Paediatr Child Health 2011;16(7):417-20: www.cps.ca/en/documents/position/pneumonia-management-children-youth (Accessed April 15, 2013).

Disclaimer: The recommendations in this position statement do not indicate an exclusive course of treatment or procedure to be followed. Variations, taking into account individual circumstances, may be appropriate. Internet addresses are current at time of publication.

Last updated: May 11 2016