The use of alternative therapies in treating children with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder

Psychosocial Paediatrics Committee, Canadian Paediatric Society (CPS)

Paediatrics & Child Health 2002;7(10):710-8
Reference No. PP 2002-03

Revision in progress January 2009

Parent handout: Alternative treatments for attention deficit hyperactivity disorder

Index of position statements from the Psychosocial Paediatrics Committee


The Canadian Paediatric Society gives permission to print single copies of this document from our website. Visit the index of position statements to see which are available as pdf files. For permission to reprint or reproduce multiple copies, please submit a detailed request to info@cps.ca.

Contents


Objectives

The objectives of the present statement are to:

  • Provide an overview of alternative therapies commonly used in attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD).
  • Review the pharmacology and toxicology of alternative medicines for ADHD.
  • Discuss the available evidence about the efficacy of alternative therapies for ADHD.
Introduction

ADHD is a common and complex disorder for which no specific neuroanatomical, physiological, biochemical or psychological origin has been identified. Despite the effectiveness and relative safety of stimulant medications, many parents are concerned about giving their child a psychoactive, ‘mind-altering’ medication for what is likely to be a long period of time. As with many chronic diseases of childhood, parents have turned to complementary and alternative medicine (1). There is a plethora of information on alternative therapies for ADHD in the mainstream media and on the Internet. Evidence-based reports were identified from the MEDLINE database and references of review articles published in peer-reviewed literature (Table 1).

Dietary Management

Dietary interventions are the most popular alternative therapies in ADHD (2) and primarily include the following types of diets.

Elimination diets in ADHD
The Feingold diet:
In his book, Why Your Child is Hyperactive (3), Feingold reported that when treated with the salicylate and additive-free diet, 50% of children with ADHD achieved a “full response”, and showed a return to symptoms when the offending food artificial additives were reintroduced. The effects of this diet have been reviewed in controlled studies (4-12), showing that improvements were not consistent, occurring generally on parental report, but rarely substantiated by laboratory measures (13,14).

Elimination of food allergens
Over the past 15 years, double-blind, placebo controlled food allergen challenge studies have shown some results on more differentiated outcomes (15-18). This recent research led to the following conclusions (19).

  • Appropriate elimination diets are more likely to improve behaviour in younger children with atopic histories, a family history of migraine, and a family history of food reactivity.
  • Common dietary allergens are implicated (milk, nuts, fish, wheat and soy) as well as additives.
  • Specific target behaviours should be considered.

Restriction of sugar and aspartame
There is a tenacious ‘myth’ that sugar and aspartame intake can cause hyperactive behaviour. Although Prinz et al (20) found correlations between the amount of sugar consumed and levels of observed inappropriate behaviour, no causality could be demonstrated. Further challenge studies (21-24) showed no effect of dietary sucrose or aspartame on children’s behaviour.

Another popular theory comes from Crook’s The Yeast Connexion (25), which postulates that chronic candidiasis and candida toxin production is responsible for hyperactivity. Treatment based on this theory includes the use of antifungal agents, and a diet free of any sugar source that could promote yeast growth, and any foods made with or contaminated by molds and yeast (eg, bread, cheese, processed foods, dried fruits). This has not been scientifically validated.

Dietary supplements
Megavitamin therapy:
A double-blind, placebo controlled, crossover study of megavitamin treatment (combination of B6, niacinamide, ascorbic acid and panthotenate) of children with ADHD showed no improvement on behaviour (26). One should also be concerned by reports of toxicity of megavitamin therapy (27) (Table 2).

Iron: Proven iron deficiency should be treated. However, an open trial of iron supplementation in noniron-deficient boys with ADHD showed no improvement in teacher behavioural ratings, although parent behavioural ratings improved (28). Because this study was not followed by a controlled clinical trial, there is no support for an indication of routine iron supplementation of children with ADHD.

Magnesium: One study showed behavioural improvement in a cohort of children with ADHD and relative deficiency in magnesium (29). However, this isolated report does not justify routine magnesium supplementation in children with ADHD.

Pyridoxine (vitamin B6): One double-blind study showed a trend in favour of behavioural improvement in children with ADHD receiving pyridoxine compared with methylphenidate and placebo (30). No other study confirmed this trend, and pyridoxine is not recommended unless a deficiency is documented.

Zinc: One study found lower serum zinc in healthy, normally nourished children with ADHD, compared with a group of children without ADHD (31). Another study suggested that zinc nutrition may be important for the response of ADHD children to dextroamphetamine, and that the possible benefit of evening primrose oil (gamma-linolenic acid) derives from the improvement or compensation for borderline zinc nutrition (32). There are no controlled studies, and supplementation beyond the recommended daily allowance is not indicated in the absence of documented deficiency.

Essential fatty acids: Some studies have shown that children with ADHD had a higher rate of nonspecific symptoms typical of essential fatty acids deficiency (eg, increased thirst and atopy) (33-35). Evening primrose oil contains over 70% cis-linoleic acid and about 9% cis-gamma linolenic acid, and has been reputed to improve behaviour of hyperactive children (36). Another source of essential fatty acids is fish oil, which contains docosahexaenoic acid, a long chain polyunsaturated fatty acid whose obligate precursor is alpha-linolenic acid. However, three blinded placebo controlled studies on essential fatty acid supplementation in children with ADHD showed minimal or no behavioural improvements (37-39).

Role of nutritional supplementation in the treatment of ADHD
Children with ADHD may be at an increased risk for marginal deficiency of some micronutrients, because of erratic eating habits and decreased appetite secondary to treatment with stimulant medications. Although no studies support using megadoses of any micronutrient, children with ADHD may need a daily multivitamin and mineral supplement to meet the recommended daily nutritional requirements (40).

Nootropics
Nootropics are substances reported to enhance mental competence. The most commonly used is piracetam, which acts possibly through the enhancement of dopamine and noradrenaline transmission (41). There are no controlled studies to date of piracetam’s effect on ADHD. Another nootropic frequently contained in over-the-counter ADHD remedies is deanol, considered to be an acetylcholine precursor. In one double-blind, placebo controlled study, deanol seemed to improve performance in children with learning and behavioural disorders about as much as methylphenidate (42). However, selection criteria were very loose. Children were referred for poor school performance; the sample studied was heterogeneous, with only 49 of 74 children having a clear history of hyperactivity; and there was no measure of core symptoms of ADHD.

Herbal remedies
These agents have been used for a long time for their sedative or anxiolytic properties as well as their possible enhancement of memory and cognition (43). Sedative herbs are quite popular because of the frequency of sleep problems in children with ADHD (44). The most popular sedative herbs include chamomile (45), lemon balm, valerian, passion flower and hops.

  • Herbal teas, which contain chamomile, spearmint, lemon grass, and other herbs and flowers are considered to be a safe and effective way to help a child relax. However, their chronic use because of stress should be considered as a possible sign that the child has an underlying problem that needs to be addressed (43). Some cases have been reported of diminished iron absorption, atopic dermatitis and allergies in children with hay fever (45).
  • Valerian has been shown to be more effective than placebo in improving sleep in clinical randomized trials with adults (46). However, to date there have been no controlled trials to evaluate valerian in paediatric sleep problems or ADHD. Side effects of valerian are limited to gastrointestinal upset and headache and this product is on the United States Food and Drug Administration’s “Generally Recognized As Safe” list (FDA’s GRAS list). The use of valerian and lemon balm combinations has been studied in randomized controlled trials in adults with sleep disorders and insomnia with positive results and without daytime sedation or rebound phenomena (47). Lemon balm has not been studied in children with sleep disorders or ADHD. This compound is on the FDA’s GRAS list, but caution should be exercised in patients with Grave’s disease because of a possible inhibition of thyroid hormones (43).
  • Passion flower is used to treat insomnia in adults (48). In combination with valerian, it has been shown in a randomized controlled trial to benefit patients with adjustment disorders and anxious mood. Hypersensitivity vasculitis and altered consciousness have been reported.
  • Hops is used as a mild sedative and/or hypnotic agent, but there are no clinical studies of its use for insomnia or anxiety disorders. Allergy and disruption of menstrual cycles have been reported (48).
  • Kava is reputed to have anxiolytic, sedative and muscle relaxant properties, without adverse effects on cognitive function or mental acuity. Several clinical trials suggest that kava lactones may be useful in managing anxiety and tension (49). There are no clinical trials about the use of kava in ADHD. Kava use has been associated with side effects that include an itchy, scaly rash (kava dermopathy), muscle weakness, coordination problems and serious liver dysfunction. A safety assessment conducted by Health Canada resulted in a stop-sale order issued in August 2002 for all products containing kava (50).
  • Ginkgo biloba is commonly used for peripheral vascular disease, cerebral ischemia and intermittent claudication. Mechanisms of action include vasoregulating activity, platelet activating factor antagonism, changes in neuron metabolism, and free-radical scavenging properties (51). Because of promising effects on adult cognition, concentration and memory (52), ginkgo formulations are used for treating ADHD, but no systematic studies have been reported. Side effects include headache, dizziness, palpitations, gastrointestinal upset and allergic skin reactions (51). Ginkgo should not be used with anticoagulants or antiplatelet agents (such as acetylsalicylic acid) and should be avoided in patients with bleeding disorders (51).
  • Blue-green algae are a source of B-complex vitamins, iron, calcium, potassium, magnesium and all 22 amino acids (43). There are no clinical trials of blue-green algae in ADHD. Algae may get contaminated by microbes, heavy metals, sewage and animal feces. Moreover, some species produce their own toxins. Main side effects include nausea, diarrhea, weakness, numbness and tingling (53).
  • St John’s wort is used as a herbal antidepressant, and a recent meta-analysis showed that it was as effective as standard antidepressants, with fewer side effects (54). There are no clinical trials on the use of St John’s wort in ADHD. Recent reports have suggested that there are interactions with various prescribed drugs (theophylline, warfarin, cyclosporine, indinavir, oral contraceptives), possibly by activation of the hepatic isoenzyme 3A4 of cytochrome P450 (55).

Studies comparing herb therapy with conventional treatment are difficult to conduct, mainly because herbal preparations are not standardized, and many questions arise about the purity, reliability, safety and toxicity of these products (56).

Antioxidants
In addition to gingko, other popular antioxidants are pycnogenol and melatonin.

  • Pycnogenol has recently been advocated for the treatment of ADHD under the speculation that it is a potent antioxidant and free radical scavenger with beneficial effects on the brain because neurons are rich in docosahexanoic acid (57). There is no scientific evidence to support that assertion (58). Pycnogenol prevents platelet aggregation and should not be used with anticoagulants (43).
  • Melatonin is a powerful antioxidant with immunological and neuroprotective effects. It has been successful in treating sleep problems in children with ADHD (59,60). Side effects include reduced daytime alertness, increased fatigue, sleepiness, headache and irritability with high doses (43).
Vision Therapy and Oculovestibular Treatment

There is no support for claims that dyslexia and secondary ADHD can be alleviated by specific ocular exercises or coloured lenses (61). A study comparing vestibular stimulation with visual stimulation and with combined vestibular and visual stimulation failed to show significant differences between treatments (62). Children’s vision should be checked regularly and any concerns should be addressed by an ophthalmologist.

Homeopathy

Homeopathy is a therapeutic system that purports to restore ‘vital energies’, by using extreme dilutions of plant, animal or mineral extracts highly individualized to the patient’s symptoms. One recent placebo controlled study demonstrated significant behaviour improvement in children with ADHD receiving homeopathic treatment (63). However:

  • Patients were assigned to placebo or homeopathy alternately in the order they were referred to the investigator for testing.
  • The investigator was not blind to treatment.
  • Many patients presented with comorbidity (phobia, post-traumatic stress disorder, manic symptoms).
  • The evaluation scale was not validated.
  • Children who were not improving after 10 days on one homeopathic prescription received a second and, if needed, a third homeopathic prescription.

Auditory Stimulation: Tomatis Method of Sound Training

There is a growing interest in the role of music in emotional and cognitive processes, and its applications in medicine and education. In a recent controlled study (64), boys with ADHD improved their arithmetic solving skills when they were listening to favourite music. However, there was a significant group order interaction, indicating that arithmetic performance was improved only in the group who received music as the first experimental condition. The Tomatis Method of Sound Training is based on the hypothesis that focus and attention can be improved with a combination of auditory stimulation and listening training, using high frequency modifications of human voice and classical music that are transmitted through an ‘electronic ear’. Although there are claims of improvement in ADHD, there have been no controlled studies to date. The high intensity of the intervention (at least 75 sessions), and the inclusion of social and academic skills training in the program could be responsible for most of the improvement (40).

Biofeedback

The goal of biofeedback is to facilitate the patient’s physiological and psychological self-regulation. Electrical or electromechanical equipment is used to measure and then feedback information about physiological processes to the patient who is given instructions about modulating one of the physiological parameters in a desired direction (65).

Electromyographical biofeedback has been used in ADHD, the assumption being that teaching general relaxation will help to reduce the hyperactivity symptoms. Results have been equivocal, due to small samples, lack of control groups, and confounding independent variables such as additional treatments (66).

Quantitative electroencephalography has documented electroencephalogram (EEG) differences between children with ADHD and non-ADHD children (67). Children with ADHD generally display over frontoparietal regions elevations of slow wave theta and/or alpha activity and diminished posterior beta activity (67,68). 

Neurofeedback, also called EEG biofeedback training, is designed to enhance certain types of EEG activity and decrease other types of EEG activity when it occurs concurrently. Auditory and/or visual signals proportional to the relevant EEG measure are presented to the child. Because the goal in children with ADHD consists of decreasing theta wave activity and increasing sensorimotor rhythm or beta wave activity, a tone may come on when the theta amplitude drops below a preset threshold, while a second tone may come on when the sensorimotor rhythm or beta amplitudes rise above a given value. Cognitive tasks are used along with auditory neurofeedback to promote generalization (69).

Studies of neurofeedback in the 1970s and 1980s generally used a pre- and post-treatment testing design, or an ABA reversal design (experimental condition A, followed by experimental condition B, followed by experimental condition A), with the subject as his/her own control. Sample size was small, limiting generalizability of reported sustained improvements in social and academic behaviour for substantial periods of time after treatment (70).

More recent studies of the past 10 years have confirmed earlier results of post-treatment improvement (71,72). One study comparing neurofeedback to the use of psychostimulants with well-matched experimental and control groups demonstrated significant post-treatment improvement of Test of Variables of Attention scores in both groups (73). Another study compared the effect of neurofeedback with a waiting list control condition, and showed a significant intelligence quotient (IQ) increase in the experimental group, and reduced inattentive behaviours, but aggressive and/or defiant behaviours did not differ in both groups. However, EEG data were not available, and improvements may have occurred through behavioural methods (74).

Further research is needed with larger samples and appropriate control groups, with a thorough evaluation of confounding factors, placebo effects, and selection and information biases. One should keep in mind the ethical issue of a ‘false-feedback’ design in the face of the commitment required from the children and their families, and the potential for discouragement (75). However, neurofeedback offers an alternative for patients who present significant side effects with stimulant medication, show a poor treatment response or refuse to consider medication (40).

Hypnotherapy

Hypnotherapy allows the child to gain a sense of control, increase self-esteem and competence, and reduce stress. Children usually readily accept the suggestion, and hypnosis bridges the child’s inner world of imagination and therapeutic change. Hypnotherapy is particularly helpful when integrated into a multimodal treatment context and adapted to the child’s developmental age (76). Although there are no studies showing that hypnotherapy significantly improves the core symptoms of children with ADHD, therapeutic efficacy has been reported in associated symptoms such as sleep disturbances or tics (77).

Role of the Physician

The physician is responsible for establishing a diagnosis of ADHD and other comorbidities through a standard medical evaluation, and carefully discuss the standard treatment options. The physician should be aware that parents may use alternative therapies in ADHD children, should ask about these at follow-up visits, and should be prepared to share information with families (Table 3). The physician should provide balanced advice on a range of treatment options, identify risks or potential harmful effects, and inform patients about placebo effects and the need for controlled studies. It is important to establish and maintain a trusting relationship with families (78).

Summary

  • Individualized dietary management may be effective in a small selected group of children with allergic symptoms or migraine headaches.
  • Trace element supplementation may be beneficial when specific deficiencies are present.
  • Nootropics have a role in neurotransmission, but that is not specific to ADHD.
  • Herbs have sedative and anxiolytic properties and may play a role in memory and cognition. Side effects and interactions with other medications should be discussed with parents.
  • Antioxidants have neuroprotective effects, but they are not specific to ADHD. Parents should be warned about side effects and interactions with other medications.
  • Biofeedback involves a substantial commitment from the child and the family, and may be offered in cases where medication is not suitable (poor response, significant side effects, parental and/or child refusal).
  • Hypnotherapy may be helpful in controlling secondary symptoms.
There is no scientific evidence to support vision therapy, oculovestibular treatment or sound training.

Table 1: Description of studies

Intervention

Design

Number of patients (selection and/or measures)

Results

Comments

Dietary management

Feingold diet

 Conners (4)

DBCO

15 (DSM-II rating scales)

Improvement on teacher questionnaires only

Pronounced order effects

 Harley (5)

DBCO

36 (Conners P-TQ, observation-neuro, psychological tests)

No change on objective laboratory measures

Behavioural improvement

Pronounced order effects

Williams (6)

RDBCO

26 (Conners P-TQ rating subscales)

Improved on medication

Slight improvement on diet plus medication

Criteria-dependent effects

Levy (7)

DBCOC

22 (Psychiatric Dx Conners-WISC)

Equivocal improvement on parent questionnaire

Challenge with tartrazine only

Swanson (8)

Control challenge

40 (Conners P-TQ)
Learning tests

No behavioural differences

Worse on one laboratory task after challenge

Very high dose of colour challenge

Weiss (9)

DBCOC

22 (no diagnosis, parent observation)

No change in behaviour inventories

Repeated high dose challenge

Mattes (10)

DBCOC

RO

11 (DSM-III)

No differences

Repeated high dose challenge

Pollock (11)

DBPCC

19 (Food additive behaviour effects, Conners ratings)

No behavioural differences reported by parents

Adverse effect on Conners ratings

Rowe (12)

DBPC

54 (Reactors or not by parent opinion, behaviour/Conners)

Behavioural changes

Dose response effect

Allergen-free diet

Egger (15)

DBCOPC

31 (Conners scale Actometer/figures matching test)

Changes of behaviour and psychological tests

Treatment order effect

Kaplan (16)

WSCOPC

24 (DSM-III, Conners ASQ and physical symptoms)

Behavioural improvement reported by parents

Preschoolers only; sleep improvement

Carter (17)

DBPCC

RO

19 (DSM-III, Conners PQ, tests learning/matching)

Behavioural changes reported by parents

Changes in cognitive tests

Selection after an open trial

Boris (18)

DBPCC

RO

16 (DSM-III-R Conners APQ)

Behavioural changes reported by parents

Higher change in atopic cases

Sugar

Prinz (20)

Correlational study

28 (WWP Scale behaviour video)

Aggressive behaviour is increased with sugar

Hyperactive children only

Wolraich (21)

PCC

RO

16 (Conners PTQ Behaviour, learning and memory tasks)

No differences between challenge and placebo

Hyperactive children only

Milich (22)

PCC

16 (DSM-III behaviour, reading, math tasks)

No differences in learning or behaviour

Concurrent behaviour intervention

Wolraich (23)

DBPCC

L-S Design

RO

25 normal age 3-5, 23 sugar-sensitive age 6-10 
(cognitive and behavioural tests)

No differences on behaviour or cognitive function

High doses

Sugar-sensitivity by parent opinion

Megavitamin

Haslam (26)

DBCOPC

7/41 (open trial DSM-III-Conners)

No differences on behaviour

Potential hepatotoxicity

Iron

Sever (28)

Open trial

14 (DSM-III-R Conners P-TQ)

Improvement of behaviour

Parental report

Not by teacher

Magnesium

Starobrat-Hermelin (29)

Cohort and control

75 (DSM-IV Conners P-TQ)

Improvement of behaviour

Not blinded/ randomized co-morbidity

Pyridoxin

Coleman (30)

DBPC

Randomized

6 (DSM-II Conners P-TQ)

Improvement of behaviour

Trend with order effect

Zinc

Arnold (32)

DBCOPC

L-S design RO

18 (DSM-III Conners P-TQ)

Linear relationship with amphetamine, Efamol benefit with borderline zinc

Post-hoc study (cf. Arnold [38])

Essential fatty acids

Aman (37)

DBCOPC

Randomized

31 (RBPCparent/ Conners TQ Learning/motor)

Improvement 2/42 variables of cognitive/motor tests and behaviour

Grant from Efamol Ltd

Parent rating

Arnold (38)

DBCOPC

L-S design

RO

18 (DSM-III Conners P-TQ)

No difference between Efamol, amphetamine, or placebo on most measures

Trend with order effect

Efamol grant

Voigt (39)

DBPC Randomized

63 (DSM-IV TOVA/Colour Trails CBCL, Conners)

No improvement despite increased plasma phospholipid DHA

Stimulants withheld 24 h pretesting

Nootropics                                                     

Lewis (42)

DBPC

RO

74 (school problems, psychometric tests, WWP behaviour scale)

As effective as methylphenidate

Loose entry criteria, not all ADHD

Herbs 

Kava

Volz (50)

DBPC

Randomized Multicentre

101 (DSM-III-R Anxiety Scale)

Short-term and long-term improvement of anxiety

Adults only heterogeneous patient-group

Ginkgo biloba

Hornig (52)

Descriptive

Not specified

Improvement of vigilance

Adults only

Antioxidants

Pycnogenol

Greenblatt (57)

Case studies

More than 100

Improved school performance

No description of patients

Melatonin

Smits (60)

RPC

25 (Conners scale actigraphy)

Improved sleep

Abstract only

Oculovestibular treatment

Arnold (62)

Split-sample L-S crossover Randomized

30 (DSM-III Conners P-TQ hyperkinetic scale)

Improvement of hyperkinetic scale

Trend only

Homeopathy

Lamont (63)

DBCOPC

Not truly

43 (Psychology tests not stated)

Improved behaviour on hyperkinetic 5-point scale

Treatment not standardized comorbidity

Auditory stimulation

Abikoff (64)

Controlled

RO

40 (DSM-III-R arithmetic test)

Improvement of arithmetic skills in ADHD patients

Group order interaction

EEG Biofeedback

Lubar (71)

Open trial

23 (DSM-III-R EEG, TOVA, Behaviour scale WISC-R)

Improvement of TOVA, behaviour, and WISC-R

Three subsets (19,13,10) 
No EEG correlation

Rossiter (73)

Controlled for age, sex, IQ 

Not blinded

Not randomized

18 (DSM-III-R TOVA behaviour Scale)

Improvement of TOVA and behaviour

No differences with psychostimulants

Linden (74)

Randomized controlled study with waiting list

18 (DSM-III-R, IQ subtests, Conners PQ)

Improvement of attention behaviour and IQ scores

Some patients with learning disorders

Legend

CBCL: Child Behaviour Checklist

Conners PTQ: Conners Parent Teacher Questionnaire

DBCO: Double-blind, cross over

DBCOC: Double-blind, cross over challenge

DBCOPC: Double-blind, cross over placebo controlled

DBPC: Double-blind placebo-controlled

DBPCC: Double-blind placebo-controlled challenge

DSM: Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders

L-S: Latin-Square

PCC: Placebo-controlled challenge

RBPC: Revised Behaviour Problem Checklist

RDBCO: Randomized double-blind cross-over

RO: Randomized order

RPC: Randomized placebo-controlled

TOVA: test of Variables of Attention

WISC: Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children

WSCOPC: Within-subject cross-over placebo-controlled

WWP Scale: Werry-Weiss-Peter Scale

Table 2: Side-effects and drug interactions

Therapy

Side-effects

Drug interactions

Megavitamins

Hepatotoxicity

Essential fatty acids

Gastrointestinal symptoms, headaches

None known

Nootropics

Unknown

None known

Herbs

Valerian

Headaches

Increases sleeping time with pentobarbital

Kava

Muscle weakness, rash, weight loss, increased HDL, hematuria

Potentiates benzodiazepines Necrotizing hepatitis with other herbs

Ginkgo biloba

Headaches, dizziness, rash, gastrointestinal symptoms, palpitations

Potentiates anticoagulants

Blue-green algae

Gastrointestinal symptoms, weakness, numbness, tingling

None known

Antioxidants

Pycnogenol

None known

Prevents platelet aggregation Not to be used with anticoagulants

Melatonin

Headaches, fatigue, sleepiness, irritability

Proconvulsant effects in children with neurological disabilities

Possible suppression of puberty

Adapted from reference 43

Table 3: Selected web sites

Independent evaluation of various products
www.consumerlab.com
A commercial site with many articles and references
www.lef.org
National Institute of Health Office of Dietary Supplements
http://ods.od.nih.gov/
National Center for Complementary and Alternative Medicine
http://nccam.nih.gov/
Health Canada web site on Natural Products
www.hc-sc.gc.ca/hpb/onhp/

References

1. Spigelblatt L, Laine-Ammara G, Pless IB, Guyver A. The use of alternative medicine by children. Pediatrics 1994;94:811-4.

2. Stubberfield TG, Parry TS. Utilization of alternative therapies in attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder. J Paediatr Child Health 1999;35:450-3.

3. Feingold BF. Why Your Child is Hyperactive. New York: Random House, 1975:71-8.

4. Conners CK, Goyette CH, Southwick DA, Lees JM, Andrunolis PA. Food additives and hyperkinesis: A controlled double-blind experiment. Pediatrics 1976;58:154-66.

5. Harley JP, Ray RS, Tomasi L, et al. Hyperkinesis and food additives: Testing the Feingold hypothesis. Pediatrics 1978;61:818-28.

6. Williams JI, Cram DM, Tausig FT, Webster E. Relative effects of drugs and diet on hyperactive behaviors: An experimental study. Pediatrics 1978;61:811-7.

7. Levy F, Dumbrell S, Hobbes G, Ryan M, Wilton N, Woodhill JM. Hyperkinesis and diet: A double-blind crossover trial with a tartrazine challenge. Med J Aust 1978;1:61-4.

8. Swanson JM, Kinsbourne M. Food dyes impair performance of hyperactive children on a laboratory learning test. Science 1980;207:1485-6.

9. Weiss B, Williams JH, Margen S, et al. Behavioral responses to artificial food colors. Science 1980;207:1487-9.

10. Mattes JA, Gittelman R. Effects of artificial food colorings in children with hyperactive symptoms: A critical review and results of a controlled study. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1981;38:714-8.

11. Pollock I, Warner JO. Effect of artificial food colours on childhood behaviour. Arch Dis Child 1990;65:74-7.

12. Rowe KS, Rowe KJ. Synthetic food coloring and behavior: A dose response effect in a double-blind, placebo-controlled, repeated measures study. J Pediatr 1994;125:691-8.

13. Kavale KA, Forness SR. Hyperactivity and diet treatment: A meta-analysis of the Feingold hypothesis. J Learn Dis 1983;16:324-30.

14. Wender EH. The food-additive free diet in the treatment of behavior disorders: A review. J Dev Behav Pediatr 1986;7:35-42.

15. Egger J, Graham PJ, Carter CM, Gumley D, Soothill JF. Controlled trial of oligoantigenic treatment in the hyperkinetic syndrome. Lancet 1985;i:540-5.

16. Kaplan BJ, McNicol J, Conte RA, Moghadam HK. Dietary replacement in preschool-aged hyperactive boys. Pediatrics 1989;83:7-17.

17. Carter CM, Urbanowicz, Hemsley R, et al. Effects of a few food diet in attention deficit disorder. Arch Dis Child 1993;69:564-8.

18. Boris M, Mandel F. Foods and additives are common causes of the attention deficit hyperactivity disorder in children. Ann Allergy 1994;72:462-7.

19. Breakey J. The role of diet and behaviour in children. J Paediatr Child Health 1997;33:190-4.

20. Prinz RJ, Roberts WA, Hantmann E. Dietary correlates of hyperactive behavior in children. J Consult Clin Psychol 1980;48:760-9.

21. Wolraich M, Milich R, Stumbo P, Schultz F. Effects of sucrose ingestion on the behavior of hyperactive boys. J Pediatr 1985;106:675-81.

22. Milich R, Pelham WE. Effects of sugar ingestion in the classroom and playground behavior of attention deficit disordered boys. J Consult Clin Psychol 1986;54:714-8.

23. Wolraich ML, Lindgren SD, Stumbo PJ, Stegink LD, Appelbaum MI, Kiritsy MC. Effects of diets high in sucrose or aspartame on the behavior and cognitive performance of children. N Engl J Med 1994;330:301-7.

24. Milich R, Wolraich M, Lindgren S. Sugar and hyperactivity: A critical review of empirical findings. Clin Psychol Rev 1986;6:493-513.

25. Crook WG. The Yeast Connexion. New York: Vintage Books, 1986.

26. Haslam R. Is there a role for megavitamin therapy in the treatment of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder? Adv Neurol 1992;58:303-10.

27. Canadian Paediatric Society Nutrition Committee. Megavitamin and megamineral therapy in childhood. CMAJ 1990;143:1009-13.

28. Sever Y, Ashkenazi A, Tyano S. Iron treatment in children with attention deficit disorder. A preliminary report. Neuropsychobiology 1997;35:178-80.

29. Starobrat-Hermelin B, Kozielec T. The effects of magnesium physiological supplementation on hyperactivity in children with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD): Positive response to magnesium oral loading test. Magnes Res 1997;10:149-56.

30. Coleman M, Steinberg G, Tippett J, et al. A preliminary study of the effect of pyridoxine administration in a subgroup of hyperkinetic children: A double-blind crossover comparison with methylphenidate. Biol Psychiatry 1979;14:741-51.

31. Toren P, Eldar S, Sela BA, et al. Zinc deficiency in attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder. Biol Psychiatry 1996;40:1308-10.

32. Arnold LE, Pinkham SM, Votolato N. Does zinc moderate essential fatty acid and amphetamine treatment of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder? J Child Adolesc Psychopharmacol 2000;10:11-117.

33. Colquhoun I, Bunday S. A lack of essential fatty acids as a possible cause of hyperactivity in children. Med Hypotheses 1981;7:673-9.

34. Mitchell EA, Aman MG, Turbott SH, Manku M. Clinical characteristics and serum essential fatty acid levels in hyperactive children. Clin Pediatr 1987;26:406-11.

35. Stevens LJ, Zentall SS, Deck JL, et al. Essential fatty acid metabolism in boys with attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder. Am J Clin Nutr 1995;62:761-8.

36. Briggs CJ. Evening Primrose. Can Pharm J 1986;119:249-54.

37. Aman MG, Mitchell EA, Turbott SH. The effects of essential fatty acid supplementation by Efamol in hyperactive children. J Abnorm Child Psychol 1987;15:75-90.

38. Arnold LE, Kleykamp D, Votolato NA, Taylor WA, Kontras SB, Tobin K. Gamma-linoleic acid for attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder: Placebo-controlled comparison to D-amphetamine. Biol Psychiatry 1989;25:222-8.

39. Voigt RG, Llorent AM, Jensen CL, Fraley JK, Berretta MC, Heird WC. A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of docosahexaenoic acid supplementation in children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. J Pediatr 2001;139:189-96.

40. Baumgaertel A. Alternative and controversial treatments for attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Pediatr Clin North Am 1999;46:977-92.

41. Gouliaev AH, Senning A. Piracetam and other structurally related nootropics. Brain Res Rev 1994;19:180-222.

42. Lewis JA, Young R. Deanol and methylphenidate in minimal brain dysfunction. Clin Pharmacol Ther 1975;17:534-40.

43. Chan E, Gardiner P, Kemper KJ. “At least it’s natural...”. Herbs and dietary supplements in ADHD. Contemp Pediatr 2000;17:116-30.

44. Day HD, Abmayr SB. Parent reports of sleep disturbances in stimulant-medicated children with attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder. J Clin Psychol 1998;54:701-16.

45. Berry M. The chamomiles. Pharm J 1995;254:191-3.

46. Lindhal O, Lindwall L. Double blind study of a valerian preparation. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 1989;32:1065-6.

47. Dressing H, Riemann D. Insomnia: Are valerian/Melissa combinations of equal value to benzodiazepine? Therapiewoche 1992;42:726-36.

48. Wong AHC, Smith M, Boon HS. Herbal remedies in psychiatric practice. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1998;55:1033-44.

49. Volz HP, Kieser M. Kava-kava extract WS 1940 vs. Placebo in anxiety disorders – A randomized placebo-controlled 25-week outpatient trial. Pharmacopsychiatry 1997;30:1-5.

50. Health Canada Online. <http://www.hc-sc.gc.ca/english/protection/warnings/2002/2002_56e.htm> (Version current at October 30, 2002).

51. Kleijnen J, Knipschild P. Ginkgo biloba. Lancet 1992;340:1136-9.

52. Hornig M. Ginkgo biloba for attention and memory disorders. Alt Med Alert 1998;1:137-9.

53. NCAHF. Growing concerns over blue-green algae. National Council Against Health Fraud Newsletter 1996;1:1.

54. Linde K, Ramirez G, Mulrow CD, Pauls A, Weidenhammer W, Melchart D. St John’s wort for depression – An overview and meta-anlysis of randomized clinical trials. BMJ 1996;313:253-8.

55. Ernst E. Second thoughts about safety of St John’s wort. Lancet 1999;354:2014-5.

56. Kemper KJ, Cassileth B, Ferris T. Holistic pediatrics: A research agenda. Pediatrics 1999;103:902-3.

57. Greenblatt J. Nutritional supplements in ADHD. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 1999;38:1209-10. (Lett)

58. Horrigan JP. Comment. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 1999;38:1210-1.

59. Jan JE, O’Donnell ME. Use of melatonin in the treatment of paediatric sleep disorders. J Pineal Res 1996;21:193-9.

60. Smits M, Nagtegaal E, Valentijn S. Melatonin for chronic sleep onset insomnia in children with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder: Randomized placebo controlled trial. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1999;67:840.

61. American Academy of Pediatrics. Learning disabilities, dyslexia, and vision: A subject review. Pediatrics 1998;102:1217-9.

62. Arnold LE, Clark DL, Sachs LA, Jakim S, Smithies C. Vestibular and visual rotational stimulation as treatment for attention deficit and hyperactivity. Am J Occup Ther 1985;39:84-91.

63. Lamont J. Homeopathic treatment of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. A controlled study. Br Homeopath J 1997;86:196-200.

64. Abikoff H, Courtney ME, Szeibel PJ, Koplewicz HS. The effects of auditory stimulation on the arithmetic performance of children with ADHD and nondisabled children. J Learn Disabil 1996;29:238-46.

65. Culbert TP, Kajander RL, Reaney JB. Biofeedback with children and adolescents: Clinical observations and patient perspectives. J Dev Behav Pediatr 1996;17:342-50.

66. Lee SW. Biofeedback as a treatment for childhood hyperactivity: A critical review of the literature. Psychol Rep 1991;68:163-92.

67. Mann C, Lubar JF, Zimmerman AW, Millar CA, Muenchen RA. Quantitative analysis of EEG in boys with attention deficit-hyperactivity disorder: Controlled study with clinical applications. Pediatr Neurol 1992;8:30-6.

68. Lazarro I, Gordon E, Whitmont S. Quantified EEG activity in adolescent attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. Clin Electroencephalogr 1998;29:37-42.

69. Nash JK. Treatment of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder with neurotherapy. Clin Electroencephalogr 2000;31:30-7.

70. Lubar JF. Discourse on the developpement of EEG diagnostics and biofeedback treatment for attention deficit/hyperactivity disorders. Biofeedback Self Regul 1991;16:201-25.

71. Lubar JF, Swartwood MO, Swartwood JN, O’Donnell P. Evaluation of the effectiveness of EEG neurofeedback training for ADHD in a clinical setting as measured by changes in T.O.V.A. scores, behavioral ratings, and WISC-R performance. Biofeedback Self Regul 1995;20:83-99.

72. Alhambra MA, Fowler TPP, Alhambra AA. EEG biofeedback: A new treatment option for ADD/ADHD. J Neurother 1995;1:39-43.

73. Rossiter TR, LaVaque TJ. A comparison of EEG biofeedback and psychostimulants in treating attention deficit/hyperactivity disorders. J Neurother 1995;1:48-59.

74. Linden M, Habib T, Radojevic V. A controlled study of the effects of EEG biofeedback on cognition and behavior of children with attention deficit disorder and learning disabilities. Biofeedback Self Regul 1996;21:35-49.

75. Baydala L, Wikman E. The efficacy of neurofeedback in the management of children with attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Paediatr Child Health 2001;6:451-5.

76. Sugarman IL. Hypnosis in a primary care practice: Developing skills for the “new morbidities”. J Dev Behav Pediatr 1996;17:300-5.

77. Kohen DP. Applications of relaxation and mental imagery (self-hypnosis) for habit problems. Pediatr Ann 1991;20:136-44.

78. American Academy of Pediatrics. Committee on Children with Disabilities. Counselling families who choose complementary and alternative medicine for their child with chronic illness or disability. Pediatrics 2001;107:598-601.

Psychosocial Paediatrics Committee (2002-2003)

Members: Drs Anne-Claude Bernard-Bonnin, Département de pédiatrie, Hôpital Sainte-Justine, Montréal, Québec; Kim Joyce Burrows, Kelowna, British Columbia; Anthony Ford-Jones, Department of Pediatrics, Joseph Brant Memorial Hospital, Burlington, Ontario; Sally Longstaffe, Child Development Clinic, Children’s Hospital, Winnipeg, Manitoba (chair); Theodore A Prince, General and Developmental Pediatrics, Calgary, Alberta; Sarah Emerson Shea, IWK Health Centre, Halifax, Nova Scotia (director responsible)
Consultants: Drs Rose Geist, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario (Canadian Academy of Child Psychiatry); William J Mahoney, Children’s Hospital, Hamilton Health Sciences Centre, Hamilton, Ontario; Peter Nieman, Calgary, Alberta
Liaisons: Drs Joseph F Hagan, University of Vermont College of Medicine, Burlington, Vermont (Committee on Psychosocial Aspects of Child & Family, American Academy of Pediatrics); Anton Miller, Sunnyhill Health Centre for Children, Vancouver, British Columbia (Developmental Paediatrics Section, Canadian Paediatric Society)
Principal author: Dr Anne-Claude Bernard-Bonnin, Hôpital Sainte-Justine, Montreal, Quebec


Disclaimer: The recommendations in this position statement do not indicate an exclusive course of treatment or procedure to be followed. Variations, taking into account individual circumstances, may be appropriate. Internet addresses are current at time of publication.