Management of acute otitis media – a summary S Forgie, G Zhanel, J Robinson; Canadian Paediatric Society, Infectious Diseases and Immunization Committee
Paediatr Child Health 2009;14(7):457-60
Summary of Reference: ID 2009-01
Parent handout: Ear infections
Index of position statements from the Infectious Diseases and Immunization Committee
| The Canadian Paediatric Society gives permission to print single copies of this document from our website. Visit the index of position statements to see which are available as pdf files. For permission to reprint or reproduce multiple copies, please submit a detailed request to info@cps.ca. |
Contents
The present position statement updates a previous document released in 1998 (1). It does not address infections among children with craniofacial abnormalities, immuno-compromising conditions or complicated acute otitis media (AOM), or newborns younger than eight weeks of age.
For the complete version of the present position statement and references, please visit www.cps.ca/English/publications/InfectiousDiseases.htm
ARE CERTAIN CHILDREN AT HIGHER RISK FOR AOM?
The major risk factors for AOM are young age and daycare attendance. Other risk factors include orofacial abnormalities, household crowding, exposure to cigarette smoke, premature birth, not being breastfed, immunodeficiency and a positive family history of otitis media. Children of First Nations or Inuit ethnicity are also at higher risk for AOM.
HOW SHOULD ONE DIAGNOSE AOM?
It is rare to have AOM in the absence of an upper respiratory tract infection. On examination, one should look for pus under pressure behind the tympanic membrane (Table 1).
If AOM is diagnosed based on the criteria in table 1, is antimicrobial treatment indicated?
Viruses play an important role in the pathogenesis of AOM and may be a direct cause of spontaneously resolving AOM (2). However, studies (3-5) using tympanocentesis show bacteria such as Streptococcus pneumoniae, Haemophilus influenzae or Moraxella catarrhalis are present most of the time.
Symptoms of AOM will resolve more quickly if antimicrobials are prescribed (6). However, the treatment effect is small – approximately 15 children have to be treated for one child to have resolution of symptoms (clinical cure) by 48 h. There have been criticisms of the studies that led to this conclusion, including the use of clinical diagnostic criteria, use of clinical as opposed to bacteriological cure, and inconsistent use of placebo in the control groups (7). Despite these criticisms, it is clear that spontaneous resolution occurs in most cases. Not all children with AOM should receive immediate treatment with antimicrobial agents, and a watchful waiting approach with analgesia can be used in many cases.
WHEN IS IT APPROPRIATE TO ADOPT A WATCHFUL WAITING APPROACH?
If the child is older than six months of age, with mild signs and symptoms, observation without the use of antimicrobials for 48 h to 72 h may be an option if follow-up can be assured (Table 2) (8). The family should be advised about analgesia and either instructed to return if there is no improvement or provided with a prescription for antimicrobials that can be filled at the parents’ discretion (deferred prescription). Although symptom resolution may take slightly longer with this approach, parents are generally satisfied, and only approximately one-third of those children eventually receive antimicrobials (9,10).
This watchful waiting option is not appropriate for children who have severe symptoms (appear toxic, have severe otalgia and/or high fever [greater than 39°C, orally]) (11). Aboriginal children have been found to have a high incidence of chronic suppurative otitis media, but it is not known whether a watchful waiting approach in these children increases the risk of this complication. Nonetheless, it would seem prudent to prescribe antimicrobials sooner to Aboriginal children.
WHAT ARE THE RISKS OF COMPLICATIONS IF ANTIMICROBIALS ARE DEFERRED OR NOT PRESCRIBED FOR AOM?
In the Netherlands, where 30% of children with AOM receive an antimicrobial prescription, the incidence of mastoiditis was double the incidence in countries where prescription rates were greater than 90% (12). However, given the rarity of mastoiditis, at least 2500 prescriptions would have to be filled to prevent one case. Furthermore, only one-quarter of mastoiditis cases require a mastoidectomy, and one-half of children with mastoiditis develop this complication despite previously taking antimicrobials for AOM (13). There are no comparable studies for other severe suppurative complications of AOM, but again, it seems likely that thousands of children would have to be treated to prevent one complication.
There are also risks associated with the use of antimicrobials, including diarrhea, Stevens-Johnson syndrome or anaphylaxis. Additionally, antibiotic resistance is primarily driven by the over-use of antibiotics.
WHAT IS THE FIRST-CHOICE ANTIMICROBIAL AGENT FOR AOM?
Amoxicillin remains the drug of choice because it is inexpensive and well tolerated, and can achieve high levels in the middle ear (Table 3). Beta-lactamase-producing M catarrhalis and H influenzae may not respond to amoxicillin, but spontaneous resolution of AOM is common with these organisms.
If symptoms do not resolve, should the antimicrobial be changed?
Symptoms should improve within one to two days and resolve within two to three days of starting antimicrobials. If symptoms have not improved after two days, the antimicrobial should be changed to one that targets both penicillin-resistant S pneumoniae and beta-lactamase-producing organisms – two choices are amoxicillin/clavulanate (Table 4) or parenteral ceftriaxone (14). Middle ear effusions, on the other hand, may persist for months, despite clinical and bacteriological resolution. Therefore, the presence of middle ear effusion does not necessitate a change in antimicrobials.
What is an appropriate duration of antimicrobial therapy for AOM?
Five days of antimicrobial treatment with amoxicillin or second-generation cephalosporins are at least as effective as 10 days of therapy in children older than two years of age with uncomplicated AOM (15,16).
DO SOME CHILDREN WARRANT A 10-DAY COURSE OF THERAPY FOR AOM?
Yes – children younger than two years of age, children with frequent, recurrent AOM or otitis media with perforated tympanic membrane, and children who failed their initial antimicrobial warrant a 10-day course of therapy because these children are at increased risk of treatment failure (exceptions to this rule are azithromycin for which a five-day course is the maximum, and ceftriaxone for which one dose is usually given for uncomplicated cases and three doses for cases that failed initial therapy) (17).
WHAT CAN PARENTS DO TO REDUCE THEIR CHILD’S RISK OF DEVELOPING AOM?
Parents can reduce their child’s risk for AOM by implementing practices that reduce the chances of contracting viral respiratory tract infections or by preventing other factors that promote inflammation of the eustachian tube:
WHICH VACCINES WILL OFFER PROTECTION AGAINST AOM?
The influenza vaccine is highly encouraged for healthy children older than six months of age and for their caregivers (28). Influenza plays a role in the pathogenesis of AOM, and the killed influenza vaccine has been shown to provide some protection against AOM in toddlers (29-31). Although not yet available in Canada, the live attenuated intranasal vaccine showed high efficacy (94% to 98%) in preventing influenza-associated AOM in children 15 to 71 months of age (32,33). The pneumococcal conjugate vaccine is part of the routine schedule for all Canadian children. This vaccine has limited efficacy against AOM because only seven pneumococcal serotypes are contained in the current vaccine. However, newer vaccines with more serotypes and other bacterial components are showing a greater effect against AOM (34,35).
RECOMMENDATIONS (36)
The levels of evidence reported in the recommendations have been described using the evaluation of evidence criteria outlined by the Canadian Task Force on Preventive Health Care (36).
INFECTIOUS DISEASES AND IMMUNIZATION COMMITTEE
Members: Drs Robert Bortolussi, IWK Health Centre, Halifax, Nova Scotia (Chair); Jane Finlay, Richmond, British Columbia; Joan L Robinson, Edmonton, Alberta; Élisabeth Rousseau-Harsany, Sainte-Justine UHC, Montreal, Quebec (Board Representative); Lindy M Samson, Children’s Hospital of Eastern Ontario, Ottawa, Ontario
Consultants: Drs Noni E MacDonald, IWK Health Centre, Halifax, Nova Scotia; Dorothy L Moore, The Montreal Children’s Hospital, Montreal, Quebec
Liaisons: Drs Upton D Allen, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario (Canadian Pediatric AIDS Research Group); Charles PS Hui, Children’s Hospital of Eastern Ontario, Ottawa, Ontario (CPS Liaison to Health Canada, Committee to Advise on Tropical Medicine and Travel); Nicole Le Saux, Children’s Hospital of Eastern Ontario, Ottawa, Ontario (Immunization Program, ACTive); Larry Pickering, Elk Grove, Illinois, USA (American Academy of Pediatrics); Marina I Salvadori, Children’s Hospital of Western Ontario, Ottawa, Ontario (CPS Liaison to Health Canada, National Advisory Committee on Immunization)
Principal authors: Drs Sarah ED Forgie, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta; George Zhanel; University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba; Joan L Robinson, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta
Posted: September 2009
| Disclaimer: The recommendations in this position statement do not indicate an exclusive course of treatment or procedure to be followed. Variations, taking into account individual circumstances, may be appropriate. Internet addresses are current at time of publication. |