Management of acute otitis media – a summary

S Forgie, G Zhanel, J Robinson; Canadian Paediatric Society, Infectious Diseases and Immunization Committee

Paediatr Child Health 2009;14(7):457-60
Summary of Reference: ID 2009-01

Parent handout: Ear infections

Index of position statements from the Infectious Diseases and Immunization Committee


The Canadian Paediatric Society gives permission to print single copies of this document from our website. Visit the index of position statements to see which are available as pdf files. For permission to reprint or reproduce multiple copies, please submit a detailed request to info@cps.ca.

Contents


The present position statement updates a previous docu­ment released in 1998 (1). It does not address infections among children with craniofacial abnormalities, immuno-compromising conditions or complicated acute otitis media (AOM), or newborns younger than eight weeks of age.

For the complete version of the present position state­ment and references, please visit www.cps.ca/English/publications/InfectiousDiseases.htm

ARE CERTAIN CHILDREN AT HIGHER RISK FOR AOM?
The major risk factors for AOM are young age and daycare attendance. Other risk factors include orofacial abnormal­ities, household crowding, exposure to cigarette smoke, premature birth, not being breastfed, immunodeficiency and a positive family history of otitis media. Children of First Nations or Inuit ethnicity are also at higher risk for AOM.

HOW SHOULD ONE DIAGNOSE AOM?
It is rare to have AOM in the absence of an upper respiratory tract infection. On examination, one should look for pus under pressure behind the tympanic membrane (Table 1).

If AOM is diagnosed based on the criteria in table 1, is antimicrobial treatment indicated?
Viruses play an important role in the pathogenesis of AOM and may be a direct cause of spontaneously resolving AOM (2). However, studies (3-5) using tympanocentesis show bacteria such as Streptococcus pneumoniae, Haemophilus influ­enzae or Moraxella catarrhalis are present most of the time.

Symptoms of AOM will resolve more quickly if anti­microbials are prescribed (6). However, the treatment effect is small – approximately 15 children have to be treated for one child to have resolution of symptoms (clinical cure) by 48 h. There have been criticisms of the studies that led to this conclusion, including the use of clinical diagnostic cri­teria, use of clinical as opposed to bacteriological cure, and inconsistent use of placebo in the control groups (7). Despite these criticisms, it is clear that spontaneous resolu­tion occurs in most cases. Not all children with AOM should receive immediate treatment with antimicrobial agents, and a watchful waiting approach with analgesia can be used in many cases.

WHEN IS IT APPROPRIATE TO ADOPT A WATCHFUL WAITING APPROACH?
If the child is older than six months of age, with mild signs and symptoms, observation without the use of antimicrobials for 48 h to 72 h may be an option if follow-up can be assured (Table 2) (8). The family should be advised about analgesia and either instructed to return if there is no improvement or provided with a prescription for antimicrobials that can be filled at the parents’ discretion (deferred prescription). Although symptom resolution may take slightly longer with this approach, parents are generally satisfied, and only approximately one-third of those children eventually receive antimicrobials (9,10).

This watchful waiting option is not appropriate for chil­dren who have severe symptoms (appear toxic, have severe otalgia and/or high fever [greater than 39°C, orally]) (11). Aboriginal children have been found to have a high inci­dence of chronic suppurative otitis media, but it is not known whether a watchful waiting approach in these chil­dren increases the risk of this complication. Nonetheless, it would seem prudent to prescribe antimicrobials sooner to Aboriginal children.

WHAT ARE THE RISKS OF COMPLICATIONS IF ANTIMICROBIALS ARE DEFERRED OR NOT PRESCRIBED FOR AOM?
In the Netherlands, where 30% of children with AOM receive an antimicrobial prescription, the incidence of mas­toiditis was double the incidence in countries where pre­scription rates were greater than 90% (12). However, given the rarity of mastoiditis, at least 2500 prescriptions would have to be filled to prevent one case. Furthermore, only one-quarter of mastoiditis cases require a mastoidectomy, and one-half of children with mastoiditis develop this com­plication despite previously taking antimicrobials for AOM (13). There are no comparable studies for other severe sup­purative complications of AOM, but again, it seems likely that thousands of children would have to be treated to pre­vent one complication.

There are also risks associated with the use of anti­microbials, including diarrhea, Stevens-Johnson syndrome or anaphylaxis. Additionally, antibiotic resistance is primar­ily driven by the over-use of antibiotics.

WHAT IS THE FIRST-CHOICE ANTIMICROBIAL AGENT FOR AOM?
Amoxicillin remains the drug of choice because it is inexpensive and well tolerated, and can achieve high levels in the middle ear (Table 3). Beta-lactamase-producing M catarrhalis and H influenzae may not respond to amoxicil­lin, but spontaneous resolution of AOM is common with these organisms.

If symptoms do not resolve, should the antimicrobial be changed?
Symptoms should improve within one to two days and resolve within two to three days of starting antimicrobials. If symp­toms have not improved after two days, the antimicrobial should be changed to one that targets both penicillin-resistant S pneumoniae and beta-lactamase-producing organisms – two choices are amoxicillin/clavulanate (Table 4) or parenteral ceftriaxone (14). Middle ear effusions, on the other hand, may persist for months, despite clinical and bacteriological resolu­tion. Therefore, the presence of middle ear effusion does not necessitate a change in antimicrobials.

What is an appropriate duration of antimicrobial therapy for AOM?
Five days of antimicrobial treatment with amoxicillin or second-generation cephalosporins are at least as effective as 10 days of therapy in children older than two years of age with uncomplicated AOM (15,16).

DO SOME CHILDREN WARRANT A 10-DAY COURSE OF THERAPY FOR AOM?
Yes – children younger than two years of age, children with frequent, recurrent AOM or otitis media with perforated tympanic membrane, and children who failed their initial antimicrobial warrant a 10-day course of therapy because these children are at increased risk of treatment failure (exceptions to this rule are azithromycin for which a five-day course is the maximum, and ceftriaxone for which one dose is usually given for uncomplicated cases and three doses for cases that failed initial therapy) (17).

WHAT CAN PARENTS DO TO REDUCE THEIR CHILD’S RISK OF DEVELOPING AOM?
Parents can reduce their child’s risk for AOM by imple­menting practices that reduce the chances of contracting viral respiratory tract infections or by preventing other fac­tors that promote inflammation of the eustachian tube:

WHICH VACCINES WILL OFFER PROTECTION AGAINST AOM?
The influenza vaccine is highly encouraged for healthy chil­dren older than six months of age and for their caregivers (28). Influenza plays a role in the pathogenesis of AOM, and the killed influenza vaccine has been shown to provide some pro­tection against AOM in toddlers (29-31). Although not yet available in Canada, the live attenuated intranasal vaccine showed high efficacy (94% to 98%) in preventing influenza-associated AOM in children 15 to 71 months of age (32,33). The pneumococcal conjugate vaccine is part of the routine schedule for all Canadian children. This vaccine has limited efficacy against AOM because only seven pneumococcal sero­types are contained in the current vaccine. However, newer vaccines with more serotypes and other bacterial components are showing a greater effect against AOM (34,35).

RECOMMENDATIONS (36)
The levels of evidence reported in the recommendations have been described using the evaluation of evidence cri­teria outlined by the Canadian Task Force on Preventive Health Care (36).

Table 1

Table 2

Table 3

Table 4

REFERENCES

  1. Canadian Paediatric Society, Infectious Diseases and Immunization Committee. [Principal author: D Speert]. Antibiotic management of acute otitis media. Paediatr Child Health 1998;3:265-7.
  2. Heikkinen T, Thint M, Chonmaitree T. Prevalence of various respiratory viruses in the middle ear during acute otitis media.
    N Engl J Med 1999;340:260-4.
  3. Ruuskanen O, Heikkinen T. Viral-bacterial interaction in acute otitis media. Pediatr Infect Dis J 1994;13:1047-9.
  4. Ruuskanen O, Arola M, Heikkinen T, Ziegler T. Viruses in acute otitis media: Increasing evidence for clinical significance. Pediatr Infect Dis J 1991;10:425-7.
  5. Pichichero ME. Evolving shifts in otitis media pathogens: Relevance to a managed care organization. Am J Manag Care 2005;11:S192-201.
  6. Glasziou PP, Delmar CB, Sanders SL, Hayem M. Antibiotics for acute otitis media in children. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2004:CD000219.
  7. Dagan R, McCracken GH Jr. Flaws in design and conduct of clinical trials of acute otitis media. Pediatr Infect Dis J
    2002;21:894-902.
  8. Siegel RM, Kiely M, Bien JP, et at. Treatment of otitis media with observation and a safety-net antibiotic prescription. Pediatrics 2003;112:527-31.
  9. Little P, Gould C, Williamson I, Moore M, Warner G, Dunleavey J. Pragmatic randomised controlled trial of two prescribing strategies for childhood acute otitis media. BMJ 2001;322:336-42.
  10. McCormick DP, Chonmaitree T, Pittman C, et al. Nonsevere acute otitis media: A clinical trial comparing outcomes of watchful waiting versus immediate antibiotic treatment. Pediatrics 2005;115:1455-65.
  11. Kaleida PH, Blatter MM, Reisinger KS, et al. Amoxicillin or myringotomy or both for acute otitis media: Results of a randomized clinical trial. Pediatrics 1991;87:466-74.
  12. Van Zuijlen DA, Schilder AG, Van Balen FA, Hoes AW. National differences in incidence of acute mastoiditis: Relationship to prescribing patterns of antibiotics for acute otitis media? Pediatr Infect Dis J 2001;20:140-4.
  13. Van Zuijlen DA, Schilder AGM, Hoes AW. Antibiotics and mastoiditis: In reply. Pediatr Infect Dis J 2001;20:1012-3.
  14. Hoberman A, Marchant CD, Kaplan SL, Feldman S. Treatment of acute otitis media consensus recommendations. Clin Pediatr (Phila) 2002;41:373-90.
  15. Kafetzis DA, Astra H, Mitropoulos L. Five-day versus ten-day treatment of acute otitis media with cefprozil. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 1997;16:283-6.
  16. Kozyrskyj AL, Hildes-Ripstein GE, Longstaffe SE, et al. Treatment of acute otitis media with a shortened course of antimicrobials: A meta-analysis. JAMA 1998;279:1736-42.
  17. Cohen R, Levy C, Boucherat M, Langue J, de la Roque F. A multi-center, randomized, double blind trial of 5 versus 10 days of antibiotic therapy for acute otitis media in young children. J Pediatr 1998;133:634-9.
  18. Larson EL, Lin SX, Gomez-Pichardo C, Della-Latta P. Effect of antibacterial home cleaning and handwashing products on infectious disease symptoms: A randomized, double-blind trial.
    Ann Intern Med 2004;140:321-9.
  19. Aniansson G, Alm B, Andersson B, et al. A prospective cohort study on breast-feeding and otitis media in Swedish infants. Pediatr Infect Dis J 1994;13:183-8.
  20. Duncan B, Ey J, Holberg CJ, Wright AL, Martinez FD, Taussig LM. Exclusive breast-feeding for at least 4 months protects against otitis media. Pediatrics 1993;91:867-72.
  21. Duffy LC, Faden H, Wasielewski R, Wolf J, Krystofik D. Exclusive breastfeeding protects against bacterial colonization and day care exposure to otitis media. Pediatrics 1997;100:E7.
  22. Brown CE, Magnuson B. On the physics of the infant feeding bottle and middle ear sequela: Ear disease in infants can be associated with bottle-feeding. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 2000;54:13-20.
  23. Hanafin S, Griffiths P. Does pacifier use cause ear infections in young children? Br J Community Nurs 2002;7:206-11.
  24. Niemelä M, Uhari M, Möttönen M. A pacifier increases the risk of recurrent acute otitis media in children in day care centers. Pediatrics 1995;96:884-8.
  25. Owen MJ, Baldwin CD, Swank PR, Pannu AK, Johnson DL, Howie VM. Relation of infant feeding practices, cigarette smoke exposure, and group child care to the onset and duration of otitis media with effusion in the first two years of life. J Pediatr 1993;123:702-11.
  26. Pönkä A, Poussa T, Laosmaa M. The effect of enhanced hygiene practices on absences due to infectious diseases among children in daycare centers in Helsinki. Infection 2004;32:2-7.
  27. Ey JL, Holberg CJ, Aldous MB, Wright AL, Martinez FD, Taussig LM. Passive smoke exposure and otitis media in the first year of life. Group Health Medical Associates. Pediatrics 1995;95:670-7.
  28. Public Health Agency of Canada. Canadian Immunization Guide, Seventh Edition - 2006. <http://www.phac-aspc.gc.ca/publicat/cig-gci/index-eng.php> (Version current at February 6, 2009).
  29. Heikkinen T, Ruuskanen O, Waris M, Ziegler T, Arola M, Halonen P. Influenza vaccination in the prevention of acute otitis media in children. Am J Dis Child 1991;145:445-8.
  30. Clements DA, Langdon L, Bland C, Walter E. Influenza A vaccine decreases the incidence of otitis media in 6- to 30-month-old children in day care. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 1995;149:1113-7.
  31. Hoberman A, Greenberg DP, Paradise JL, et al. Effectiveness of inactivated influenza vaccine in preventing acute otitis media in young children:
    A randomized controlled trial. JAMA 2003;290:1608-16.
  32. Belshe RB, Gruber WC. Safety, efficacy and effectiveness of cold-adapted, live, attenuated, trivalent, intranasal influenza vaccine in adults and children. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 2001;356:1947-51.
  33. Belshe RB, Gruber WC. Prevention of otitis media in children with live attenuated influenza vaccine given intranasally. Pediatr Infect Dis J 2000;19:S66-71.
  34. Straetemans M, Sanders EA, Veenhoven RH, Schilder AG, Damoiseaux RA, Zielhuis GA. Pneumococcal vaccines for preventing otitis media. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2004:CD001480.
  35. Prymula R, Chlibek R, Splino M, et al. Safety of the 11-valent pneumococcal vaccine conjugated to non-typeable Haemophilus influenzae-derived protein D in the first 2 years of life and immunogenicity of the co-administered hexavalent diphtheria, tetanus, acellular pertussis, hepatitis B, inactivated polio virus, Haemophilus influenzae type B and control hepatitis A vaccines. Vaccine 2008;26:4563-70.
  36. Canadian Task Force on Preventive Health Care. New grades for recommendations from the Canadian Task Force on Preventive Health Care. CMAJ 2003;169:207-8.
  37. Chan LS, Takata GS, Shekelle P, Morton SC, Mason W, Marcy SM. Evidence assessment of management of acute otitis media: II. Research gaps and priorities for future research. Pediatrics 2001;108:248-54.
  38. Kaleida PH. The COMPLETES exam for otitis. Contemp Pediatr 1997;14:93-101.
  39. Karma PH, Penttila MA, Sipila MM, Kataja MJ. Otoscopic diagnosis of middle ear effusion in acute and non-acute otitis media. The value of different otoscopic findings. Int J Pediatr Otolaryngol 1989;17:37-49.
  40. Pelton SI. Otoscopy for the diagnosis of otitis media. Pediatr Inf Dis J 1998;17:540-3.
  41. Dowell SF, Marcy SM, Phillips WR, Gerber MA, Schwartz B. Otitis
    media – principles of judicious use of antimicrobial agents. Pediatrics 1998;101(Suppl):165-71.
  42. Kaleida PH, Stool SE. Assessment of otoscopists’ accuracy regarding middle-ear effusion. Otoscopic validation. Am J Dis Child 1992;146:433-5.
  43. Silva AB, Hotaling AJ. A protocol for otolarngology-head and neck resident training in pneumatic otoscopy. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 1997;40:125-31.

INFECTIOUS DISEASES AND IMMUNIZATION COMMITTEE
Members: Drs Robert Bortolussi, IWK Health Centre, Halifax, Nova Scotia (Chair); Jane Finlay, Richmond, British Columbia; Joan L Robinson, Edmonton, Alberta; Élisabeth Rousseau-Harsany, Sainte-Justine UHC, Montreal, Quebec (Board Representative); Lindy M Samson, Children’s Hospital of Eastern Ontario, Ottawa, Ontario
Consultants: Drs Noni E MacDonald, IWK Health Centre, Halifax, Nova Scotia; Dorothy L Moore, The Montreal Children’s Hospital, Montreal, Quebec
Liaisons: Drs Upton D Allen, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario (Canadian Pediatric AIDS Research Group); Charles PS Hui, Children’s Hospital of Eastern Ontario, Ottawa, Ontario (CPS Liaison to Health Canada, Committee to Advise on Tropical Medicine and Travel); Nicole Le Saux, Children’s Hospital of Eastern Ontario, Ottawa, Ontario (Immunization Program, ACTive); Larry Pickering, Elk Grove, Illinois, USA (American Academy of Pediatrics); Marina I Salvadori, Children’s Hospital of Western Ontario, Ottawa, Ontario (CPS Liaison to Health Canada, National Advisory Committee on Immunization)
Principal authors: Drs Sarah ED Forgie, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta; George Zhanel; University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba; Joan L Robinson, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta

 

Posted: September 2009


Disclaimer: The recommendations in this position statement do not indicate an exclusive course of treatment or procedure to be followed. Variations, taking into account individual circumstances, may be appropriate. Internet addresses are current at time of publication.